Suppr超能文献

消除自付药品费用可能会改善心肌梗死后的治疗效果——但这对医疗保险来说要付出什么代价呢?

Eliminating out-of-pocket drug costs may improve outcomes after myocardial infarction--but at what cost to Medicare?

作者信息

Moran Andrew, Goldman Lee

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.

出版信息

Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2008 Oct;5(10):606-7. doi: 10.1038/ncpcardio1309. Epub 2008 Aug 12.

Abstract

A standard four-drug regimen of aspirin, a beta-blocker, a lipid-lowering agent, and an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin-receptor blocker improves outcomes in survivors of myocardial infarction (MI), but adherence to this regimen is often poor. Choudhry et al. used a computer model to simulate the effectiveness and cost of improving medication adherence by eliminating out-of-pocket costs for the four-drug regimen in a hypothetical cohort of 65-year-old Medicare beneficiaries with MI. Based on the model's main assumptions, eliminating cost sharing for the regimen would be cost saving from a societal perspective, but would cost Medicare $7,182 per quality-adjusted life year. The results of the Choudhry et al. analysis suggest that improving adherence to a secondary prevention strategy by eliminating out-of-pocket costs for standard post-MI medications would be a cost-effective Medicare policy.

摘要

由阿司匹林、β受体阻滞剂、降脂药以及血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂组成的标准四联药物疗法可改善心肌梗死(MI)幸存者的预后,但对该疗法的依从性通常较差。乔德里等人使用计算机模型,在一个假设的65岁患有心肌梗死的医疗保险受益人群体中,模拟了通过消除四联药物疗法的自付费用来提高药物依从性的有效性和成本。基于该模型的主要假设,从社会角度来看,消除该疗法的费用分担将节省成本,但每增加一个质量调整生命年,医疗保险需花费7182美元。乔德里等人的分析结果表明,通过消除心肌梗死后标准药物的自付费用来提高对二级预防策略的依从性,将是一项具有成本效益的医疗保险政策。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验