Moran Andrew, Goldman Lee
Division of General Internal Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2008 Oct;5(10):606-7. doi: 10.1038/ncpcardio1309. Epub 2008 Aug 12.
A standard four-drug regimen of aspirin, a beta-blocker, a lipid-lowering agent, and an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin-receptor blocker improves outcomes in survivors of myocardial infarction (MI), but adherence to this regimen is often poor. Choudhry et al. used a computer model to simulate the effectiveness and cost of improving medication adherence by eliminating out-of-pocket costs for the four-drug regimen in a hypothetical cohort of 65-year-old Medicare beneficiaries with MI. Based on the model's main assumptions, eliminating cost sharing for the regimen would be cost saving from a societal perspective, but would cost Medicare $7,182 per quality-adjusted life year. The results of the Choudhry et al. analysis suggest that improving adherence to a secondary prevention strategy by eliminating out-of-pocket costs for standard post-MI medications would be a cost-effective Medicare policy.
由阿司匹林、β受体阻滞剂、降脂药以及血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂组成的标准四联药物疗法可改善心肌梗死(MI)幸存者的预后,但对该疗法的依从性通常较差。乔德里等人使用计算机模型,在一个假设的65岁患有心肌梗死的医疗保险受益人群体中,模拟了通过消除四联药物疗法的自付费用来提高药物依从性的有效性和成本。基于该模型的主要假设,从社会角度来看,消除该疗法的费用分担将节省成本,但每增加一个质量调整生命年,医疗保险需花费7182美元。乔德里等人的分析结果表明,通过消除心肌梗死后标准药物的自付费用来提高对二级预防策略的依从性,将是一项具有成本效益的医疗保险政策。