• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性精神科病房中的结构化风险评估与暴力行为:随机对照试验

Structured risk assessment and violence in acute psychiatric wards: randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Abderhalden Christoph, Needham Ian, Dassen Theo, Halfens Ruud, Haug Hans-Joachim, Fischer Joachim E

机构信息

Nursing and Social Education Research Unit, University Bern Psychiatric Services, Bolligenstrasse 111, Berne 60, Switzerland.

出版信息

Br J Psychiatry. 2008 Jul;193(1):44-50. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.107.045534.

DOI:10.1192/bjp.bp.107.045534
PMID:18700217
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of research on the possible contribution of a structured risk assessment to the reduction of aggression in psychiatric in-patient care.

AIMS

To assess whether such risk assessments decrease the incidence of violence and coercion.

METHOD

A cluster randomised controlled trial was conducted with 14 acute psychiatric admission wards as the units of randomisation, including a preference arm. The intervention comprised a standardised risk assessment following admission with mandatory evaluation of prevention in high-risk patients.

RESULTS

Incidence rates decreased substantially in the intervention wards, whereas little change occurred in the control wards. The adjusted risk ratios suggest a 41% reduction in severe aggressive incidents and a 27% decline in the use of coercive measures. The severity of aggressive incidents did not decrease.

CONCLUSIONS

Structured risk assessment during the first days of treatment may contribute to reduced violence and coercion in acute psychiatric wards.

摘要

背景

关于结构化风险评估对减少精神科住院治疗中攻击行为的可能作用,目前缺乏相关研究。

目的

评估此类风险评估是否能降低暴力和强制手段的发生率。

方法

以14个急性精神科入院病房作为随机分组单位进行整群随机对照试验,包括一个偏好组。干预措施包括入院后进行标准化风险评估,并对高危患者进行预防措施的强制评估。

结果

干预病房的发生率大幅下降,而对照病房变化不大。调整后的风险比表明,严重攻击事件减少了41%,强制手段的使用减少了27%。攻击事件的严重程度并未降低。

结论

治疗初期的结构化风险评估可能有助于减少急性精神科病房中的暴力和强制行为。

相似文献

1
Structured risk assessment and violence in acute psychiatric wards: randomised controlled trial.急性精神科病房中的结构化风险评估与暴力行为:随机对照试验
Br J Psychiatry. 2008 Jul;193(1):44-50. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.107.045534.
2
The effectiveness of two interventions in the management of patient violence in acute mental inpatient settings: report on a pilot study.两种干预措施在急性精神科住院环境中管理患者暴力行为的有效性:一项试点研究报告。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2004 Oct;11(5):595-601. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2004.00767.x.
3
Aggression and seclusion on acute psychiatric wards: effect of short-term risk assessment.急性精神病房的攻击和隔离:短期风险评估的影响。
Br J Psychiatry. 2011 Dec;199(6):473-8. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.111.095141. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
4
Violence risk assessment has not been shown to reduce violence.暴力风险评估尚未被证明能减少暴力行为。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2015 Jan;49(1):91. doi: 10.1177/0004867414539570. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
5
eLearning course may shorten the duration of mechanical restraint among psychiatric inpatients: a cluster-randomized trial.在线学习课程可能会缩短精神科住院患者的机械约束时间:一项整群随机试验。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2014 Oct;68(7):443-9. doi: 10.3109/08039488.2013.855254. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
6
Interventions following a high violence risk assessment score: a naturalistic study on a Finnish psychiatric admission ward.高暴力风险评估得分后的干预措施:一项关于芬兰精神科住院病房的自然主义研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jan 11;17(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1942-0.
7
Shared decision making, aggression, and coercion in inpatients with schizophrenia.精神分裂症住院患者的共享决策、侵犯和强制。
Eur Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 28;63(1):e90. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2020.88.
8
Use of coercion prevention tools in Finnish psychiatric wards.在芬兰精神病病房中使用强制预防工具。
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2020 Oct;34(5):412-420. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2020.07.013. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
9
Observational study of aggressive behaviour and coercion on an Indian acute ward.印度急症病房攻击性行为与强制约束的观察性研究
Asian J Psychiatr. 2016 Aug;22:150-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2016.06.004. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
10
Open-door policy versus treatment-as-usual in urban psychiatric inpatient wards: a pragmatic, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial in Norway.开放式病房与常规治疗在城市精神病住院病房中的比较:挪威一项实用、随机、对照、非劣效性试验。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2024 May;11(5):330-338. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(24)00039-7. Epub 2024 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the Safe Steps for De-escalation: A protocol for a mixed concurrent control study in acute mental health units.评估降级的安全步骤:急性精神卫生病房混合并行对照研究方案
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 3;20(6):e0325558. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325558. eCollection 2025.
2
Prevention of Violence in an Acute Psychiatric Unit: Spanish Validation of the Brøset Violence Checklist and Assessment of Its Predictive Capacity for Physical Restraint.急性精神科病房暴力行为的预防:《布罗泽特暴力行为清单》的西班牙语验证及其对身体约束的预测能力评估
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2025 Aug;32(4):975-985. doi: 10.1111/jpm.13176. Epub 2025 Apr 12.
3
Predictive accuracy of the Violence Risk Assessment Checklist for Youth in acute institutions: A prospective naturalistic multicenter study.
急性机构中青少年暴力风险评估清单的预测准确性:一项前瞻性自然主义多中心研究。
Eur Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 13;68(1):e19. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.3.
4
Workplace Violence Against Primary Care Clinicians: A Narrative Review.工作场所暴力对初级保健临床医生的影响:一项叙述性综述。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Nov;39(14):2806-2828. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08850-3. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
5
Risk assessment for aggressive behaviour in schizophrenia.精神分裂症攻击行为的风险评估
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 2;5(5):CD012397. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012397.pub2.
6
Interrater reliability of the violence risk assessment checklist for youth: a case vignette study.青少年暴力风险评估清单的评分者间信度:一项病例 vignette 研究
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Apr 23;24(1):303. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05746-8.
7
Implementation of guidelines on prevention of coercion and violence (PreVCo) in psychiatry: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.精神科预防强制与暴力指南(PreVCo)的实施:一项多中心随机对照试验
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2023 Nov 20;35:100770. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100770. eCollection 2023 Dec.
8
Incidence, Severity and Characteristics of Patients' Aggression in Acute Psychiatric Wards: Data from a Slovenian National Survey.急性精神科病房患者攻击行为的发生率、严重程度及特征:来自斯洛文尼亚全国性调查的数据。
Zdr Varst. 2023 Oct 4;62(4):190-197. doi: 10.2478/sjph-2023-0027. eCollection 2023 Dec.
9
Validation of a violence risk screening for youth in psychiatric inpatient care-a pilot study of V-RISK-Y.精神科住院护理中青少年暴力风险筛查的验证——V-RISK-Y的一项试点研究
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 26;14:1210871. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1210871. eCollection 2023.
10
Safe Spaces: Mitigating Potential Aggression in Acute Care Psychiatry.安全空间:减轻急性护理精神病学中的潜在攻击行为
Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). 2023 Jan;21(1):46-51. doi: 10.1176/appi.focus.20220069. Epub 2023 Jan 16.