Suppr超能文献

[胸主动脉和胸腹主动脉腔内修复术后截瘫]

[Paraplegia after endovascular repair of the thoracic and thoracoabdominal aorta].

作者信息

Kotelis D, Geisbüsch P, von Tengg-Kobligk H, Allenberg J-R, Böckler D

机构信息

Klinik für Gefässchirurgie, Vaskuläre und Endovaskuläre Chirurgie, Chirurgische Universitätsklinik Heidelberg.

出版信息

Zentralbl Chir. 2008 Aug;133(4):338-43. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1076903.

Abstract

AIM

The aim of this study was to analyse the incidence and aetiology of paraplegia secondary to endovascular repair of the thoracic and thoracoabdominal aorta (TEVAR).

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted in the patients treated at our facility between March 1997 and April 2007. During this interval, 173 patients (163 men; median age: 62 years) underwent endovascular repair of the thoracic aorta. Indications for treatment were thoracic aortic aneurysms in 36 patients, thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms in 33 patients, type B dissections in 43 patients, type A dissections in 5 patients, penetrating aortic ulcers in 31 patients, traumatic aortic transections in 9 patients, post-traumatic aortic aneurysms in 5 patients, aortobronchial fistulas in 8 patients, aortic patch ruptures in 2 patients, and an anastomotic aortic aneurysm in 1 patient. 101 procedures (58%) were conducted as emergency interventions while 72 were elective. Device design and implant strategy were chosen on the basis of an evaluation of morphology from a computed tomographic scan. Clinical assessment and imaging of the aorta (CT or magnetic resonance imaging) during follow up were performed prior to discharge, at 6 and 12 months, and then annually.

RESULTS

A primary technical success was achieved in 170 patients (98%). The overall 30-day mortality rate was 9.2%. Length of follow-up ranged from 1 to 96 months, with a mean of 52 months. Paraplegia or paraparesis developed in 3 patients (1.7%). Two of these patients had a thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm and the third a chronic expanding type B dissection, being treated with hybrid procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular repair of the thoracic and thoracoabdominal aorta is associated with a relatively low risk for postoperative paraplegia or paraparesis. Patients requiring long segment aortic coverage, and with prior aortic replacement are especially at risk.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在分析胸主动脉和胸腹主动脉腔内修复术(TEVAR)后继发截瘫的发生率及病因。

方法

对1997年3月至2007年4月在我院接受治疗的患者进行回顾性研究。在此期间,173例患者(163例男性;中位年龄:62岁)接受了胸主动脉腔内修复术。治疗指征包括36例胸主动脉瘤、33例胸腹主动脉瘤、43例B型夹层、5例A型夹层、31例穿透性主动脉溃疡、9例创伤性主动脉横断、5例创伤后主动脉瘤、8例主动脉支气管瘘、2例主动脉补片破裂以及1例吻合口主动脉瘤。101例手术(58%)为急诊干预,72例为择期手术。根据计算机断层扫描的形态学评估选择器械设计和植入策略。随访期间,在出院前、6个月和12个月以及之后每年进行主动脉的临床评估和影像学检查(CT或磁共振成像)。

结果

170例患者(98%)获得了初步技术成功。30天总死亡率为9.2%。随访时间为1至96个月,平均52个月。3例患者(1.7%)发生了截瘫或轻瘫。其中2例患者患有胸腹主动脉瘤,第3例为慢性扩张型B型夹层,均接受了杂交手术治疗。

结论

胸主动脉和胸腹主动脉腔内修复术术后截瘫或轻瘫的风险相对较低。需要长节段主动脉覆盖且既往有主动脉置换史的患者尤其危险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验