男性和女性的肥胖及心血管风险测量指标。
Measures of obesity and cardiovascular risk among men and women.
作者信息
Gelber Rebecca P, Gaziano J Michael, Orav E John, Manson Joann E, Buring Julie E, Kurth Tobias
机构信息
Division of Aging, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02120, USA.
出版信息
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Aug 19;52(8):605-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.03.066.
OBJECTIVES
This study examined associations between anthropometric measures (body mass index, waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, waist-to-height ratio [WHtR]) and risk of incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) (including nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal ischemic stroke, and cardiovascular death).
BACKGROUND
Controversy exists regarding the optimal approach to measure adiposity, and the utility of body mass index has been questioned.
METHODS
Participants included 16,332 men in the Physicians' Health Study (mean age 61 years in 1991) and 32,700 women in the Women's Health Study (mean age 61 years in 1999). We used Cox proportional hazards models to determine relative risks and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for developing CVD according to self-reported anthropometric indexes.
RESULTS
A total of 1,505 CVD cases occurred in men and 414 occurred in women (median follow-up 14.2 and 5.5 years, respectively). Although WHtR demonstrated statistically the strongest associations with CVD and best model fit, CVD risk increased linearly and significantly with higher levels of all indexes. Adjusting for confounders, the relative risk for CVD was 0.58 (95% CI: 0.32 to 1.05) for men with the lowest WHtR (<0.45) and 2.36 (95% CI: 1.61 to 3.47) for the highest WHtR (>/=0.69; vs. WHtR 0.49 to <0.53). Among women, the relative risk was 0.65 (95% CI: 0.33 to 1.31) for those with the lowest WHtR (<0.42) and 2.33 (95% CI: 1.66 to 3.28) for the highest WHtR (>/=0.68; vs. WHtR 0.47 to <0.52).
CONCLUSIONS
The WHtR demonstrated statistically the best model fit and strongest associations with CVD. However, compared with body mass index, differences in cardiovascular risk assessment using other indexes were small and likely not clinically consequential. Our findings emphasize that higher levels of adiposity, however measured, confer increased risk of CVD.
目的
本研究探讨人体测量指标(体重指数、腰围、腰臀比、腰高比[WHtR])与心血管疾病(CVD)(包括非致死性心肌梗死、非致死性缺血性中风和心血管死亡)发病风险之间的关联。
背景
关于测量肥胖的最佳方法存在争议,体重指数的效用也受到质疑。
方法
参与者包括医师健康研究中的16332名男性(1991年平均年龄61岁)和女性健康研究中的32700名女性(1999年平均年龄为61岁)。我们使用Cox比例风险模型,根据自我报告的人体测量指标确定发生CVD的相对风险和95%置信区间(CI)。
结果
男性共发生1505例CVD病例,女性发生414例(中位随访时间分别为14.2年和5.5年)。虽然WHtR在统计学上显示与CVD的关联最强且模型拟合最佳,但所有指标水平越高,CVD风险呈线性且显著增加。校正混杂因素后,WHtR最低(<0.45)的男性发生CVD的相对风险为0.58(95%CI:0.32至1.05),WHtR最高(≥0.69;与WHtR 0.49至<0.53相比)的男性相对风险为2.36(95%CI:1.61至3.47)。在女性中,WHtR最低(<0.42)的女性相对风险为0.65(95%CI:0.33至1.31),WHtR最高(≥0.68;与WHtR 0.47至<0.52相比)的女性相对风险为2.33(95%CI:1.66至3.28)。
结论
WHtR在统计学上显示模型拟合最佳且与CVD的关联最强。然而,与体重指数相比,使用其他指标进行心血管风险评估的差异较小,可能在临床上无显著意义。我们的研究结果强调,无论如何测量,肥胖程度越高,CVD风险越高。