Dehlendorf Christine E, Grumbach Kevin
Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Am J Public Health. 2008 Oct;98(10):1770-4. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.136325. Epub 2008 Aug 13.
Family physicians who wish to provide abortions have been subject to both denial of coverage by medical liability insurers and the imposition of large premium increases. These policy decisions by insurance companies raise questions about the role of family physicians in abortion care and about the autonomy of medical specialties in defining their scope of practice. We review the issues specific to abortion services in the primary care setting and examine the broader implications for the medical profession. Finally, we review how advocacy and improved regulation of the insurance industry could help to ensure that clinicians who are trained and willing to provide services to their patients are not limited by the decisions of medical liability insurers.
希望提供堕胎服务的家庭医生既面临医疗责任保险公司拒绝承保,也面临大幅提高保费的情况。保险公司的这些政策决定引发了关于家庭医生在堕胎护理中的作用以及医学专业在界定其执业范围方面的自主权的问题。我们回顾了基层医疗环境中堕胎服务特有的问题,并研究了对医学专业更广泛的影响。最后,我们回顾了倡导和加强对保险业的监管如何有助于确保经过培训并愿意为患者提供服务的临床医生不会受到医疗责任保险公司决定的限制。