Santelli John S
Heilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 60 Haven Ave, B2, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Am J Public Health. 2008 Oct;98(10):1786-92. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.119602. Epub 2008 Aug 13.
Recently, many states have implemented requirements for scientific or medical accuracy in sexuality education and HIV prevention programs. Although seemingly uncontroversial, these requirements respond to the increasing injection of ideology into sexuality education, as represented by abstinence-only programs. I describe the process by which health professionals and government advisory groups within the United States reach scientific consensus and review the legal requirements and definitions for medical accuracy. Key elements of this scientific process include the weight of scientific evidence, the importance of scientific theory, peer review, and recognition by mainstream scientific and health organizations. I propose a concise definition of medical accuracy that may be useful to policymakers, health educators, and other health practitioners.
最近,许多州都对性教育和艾滋病预防项目中的科学或医学准确性提出了要求。尽管这些要求看似没有争议,但它们是对性教育中意识形态注入增加的回应,以只强调禁欲的项目为代表。我描述了美国的健康专业人员和政府咨询小组达成科学共识的过程,并审视了医学准确性的法律要求和定义。这一科学过程的关键要素包括科学证据的权重、科学理论的重要性、同行评审以及主流科学和健康组织的认可。我提出了一个简洁的医学准确性定义,这可能对政策制定者、健康教育工作者和其他健康从业者有用。