Section of Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, 410 West 10th Street, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Matern Child Health J. 2011 Feb;15(2):169-77. doi: 10.1007/s10995-010-0574-y.
Best practices for adolescent sex education recommend science-based approaches. However, little is known about the capacity and needs of organizations who implement sex education programs on the local level. The purpose of this research was to describe successes and challenges of community organizations in implementing science-based sex education. Using qualitative methods, we interviewed program directors and educators in 17 state-funded adolescent pregnancy prevention/sex education programs as part of a larger mixed methods evaluation. Semi-structured interviews focused on success and challenges faced in implementing science-based approaches to program design, implementation and evaluation. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analyzed using a thematic approach. Grantees included a range of programs, from short programs on puberty and HIV for late elementary students, to skills-based curricular sex education programs for high schools, to year-long youth development programs. Key aspects of curricular choice included meeting the needs of the population, and working within time constraints of schools and other community partners. Populations presenting specific challenges included rural youth, youth in juvenile justice facilities, and working with Indiana's growing Latino population. Programs self-developing curricula described challenges related to assessment and evaluation of impact. Programs using commercial curricula described challenges related to curricular selection and adaptation, in particularly shortening curricula, and adapting to different cultural or social groups. A remarkable degree of innovation was observed. The use of qualitative methods permitted the identification of key challenges and successes in a state-sponsored small grants program. Information can be used to enhance program capacity and quality.
青少年性教育的最佳实践建议采用基于科学的方法。然而,对于在地方层面实施性教育计划的组织的能力和需求知之甚少。本研究的目的是描述社区组织在实施基于科学的性教育方面的成功和挑战。我们采用定性方法,对 17 个由州资助的青少年怀孕预防/性教育计划的项目主管和教育工作者进行了采访,这是一项更大的混合方法评估的一部分。半结构化访谈侧重于在项目设计、实施和评估中采用基于科学的方法所面临的成功和挑战。采访进行了录音、转录,并采用主题方法进行分析。受赠方包括各种项目,从针对小学生的青春期和艾滋病毒的短期课程,到针对高中生的基于技能的课程性教育项目,再到为期一年的青年发展项目。课程选择的关键方面包括满足人群的需求,以及在学校和其他社区合作伙伴的时间限制内开展工作。存在特定挑战的人群包括农村青年、青少年司法设施中的青年,以及与印第安纳州不断增长的拉丁裔人口合作。自行开发课程的项目描述了与评估影响相关的挑战。使用商业课程的项目描述了与课程选择和适应相关的挑战,特别是缩短课程和适应不同的文化或社会群体。观察到了相当程度的创新。定性方法的使用允许确定州赞助的小额赠款计划中的关键挑战和成功。可以利用这些信息来增强计划的能力和质量。