Cordaro Luca, Bosshardt Dieter D, Palattella Piermario, Rao Walter, Serino Giuseppe, Chiapasco Matteo
Department of Periodontology and Implant Dentistry, Eastman Dental Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Aug;19(8):796-803. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01565.x.
This investigation was designed to compare the histomorphometric results from sinus floor augmentation with anorganic bovine bone (ABB) and a new biphasic calcium phosphate, Straumann Bone Ceramic (BCP).
Forty-eight maxillary sinuses were treated in 37 patients. Residual bone width was > or =6 mm and height was > or =3 mm and <8 mm. Lateral sinus augmentation was used, with grafting using either ABB (control group; 23 sinuses) or BCP (test group; 25 sinuses); sites were randomly assigned to the control or test groups. After 180-240 days of healing, implant sites were created and biopsies taken for histological and histomorphometric analyses. The parameters assessed were (1) area fraction of new bone, soft tissue, and graft substitute material in the grafted region; (2) area fraction of bone and soft tissue components in the residual alveolar ridge compartment; and (3) the percentage of surface contact between the graft substitute material and new bone.
Measurable biopsies were available from 56% of the test and 81.8% of the control sites. Histology showed close contact between new bone and graft particles for both groups, with no significant differences in the amount of mineralized bone (21.6+/-10.0% for BCP vs. 19.8+/-7.9% for ABB; P=0.53) in the biopsy treatment compartment of test and control site. The bone-to-graft contact was found to be significantly greater for ABB (48.2+/-12.9% vs. 34.0+/-14.0% for BCP). Significantly less remaining percentage of graft substitute material was found in the BCP group (26.6+/-5.2% vs. 37.7+/-8.5% for ABB; P=0.001), with more soft tissue components (46.4+/-7.7% vs. 40.4+/-7.3% for ABB; P=0.07). However, the amount of soft tissue components for both groups was found not to be greater than in the residual alveolar ridge.
Both ABB and BCP produced similar amounts of newly formed bone, with similar histologic appearance, indicating that both materials are suitable for sinus augmentation for the placement of dental implants. The potential clinical relevance of more soft tissue components and different resorption characteristics of BCP requires further investigation.
本研究旨在比较使用无机牛骨(ABB)和一种新型双相磷酸钙——士卓曼骨陶瓷(BCP)进行上颌窦底提升后的组织形态计量学结果。
对37例患者的48个上颌窦进行治疗。剩余骨宽度≥6mm,高度≥3mm且<8mm。采用外侧上颌窦提升术,分别使用ABB(对照组;23个窦)或BCP(试验组;25个窦)进行植骨;将位点随机分配至对照组或试验组。愈合180 - 240天后,制备种植位点并进行活检以进行组织学和组织形态计量学分析。评估的参数包括:(1)移植区域内新骨、软组织和移植替代材料的面积分数;(2)剩余牙槽嵴隔室内骨和软组织成分的面积分数;(3)移植替代材料与新骨之间的表面接触百分比。
试验组56%的位点和对照组81.8%的位点可获得可测量的活检样本。组织学显示两组中新骨与移植颗粒紧密接触,试验组和对照组活检治疗隔室内矿化骨量无显著差异(BCP组为21.6±1
0.0%,ABB组为19.8±7.9%;P = 0.53)。发现ABB的骨与移植材料接触显著更大(BCP组为34.0±14.0%,ABB组为48.2±12.9%)。BCP组中移植替代材料的剩余百分比显著更低(BCP组为26.6±5.2%,ABB组为37.7±8.5%;P = 0.001),软组织成分更多(BCP组为46.4±7.7%,ABB组为40.4±7.3%;P = 0.07)。然而,两组软组织成分的量均未发现大于剩余牙槽嵴中的量。
ABB和BCP产生的新形成骨量相似,组织学外观相似,表明两种材料均适用于上颌窦提升以植入牙种植体。BCP中更多软组织成分和不同吸收特性的潜在临床相关性需要进一步研究。