Somngam Chutikarn, Samartkit Sutiwat, Kanchanasurakit Sukrit, Strietzel Frank Peter, Khongkhunthian Pathawee
Center of Excellence for Dental Implantology, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Center of Health Outcomes Research and Therapeutic Safety (Cohorts), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Phayao, Phayao, Thailand.
Int J Implant Dent. 2025 Jul 15;11(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s40729-025-00636-4.
OBJECTIVE: • To systematically determine the effectiveness of biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) as bone substitute materials (BSM) compared to other BSMs for new bone formation in dental implant treatment through a network meta-analysis (NMA). MATERIALS AND METHOD: • Following PRISMA-NMA guidelines, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on lateral sinus augmentation and dental implants comparing BCP with other BSMs for histomorphometric new bone formation were included. Studies were retrieved from MEDLINE, Cochrane, Scopus, and Embase (up to November 2024), with quality assessed via the Cochrane risk of bias 2 (RoB2.0) tool. Analysis included direct and network meta-analyses using a random-effects model, with SUCRA scores determining treatment rankings. The PROSPERO registration number was CRD42024607526. RESULTS: • Of 268 studies, 11 met criteria, covering 283 patients and 362 sinus augmentations using autografts (AB), allografts (AL), beta tricalcium phosphate (TCP), BCP, and xenografts (Xeno). NMA showed AB resulted in 12.33% more new bone formation than BCP (95% CI: 10.74, 13.93), with AL showing 5.14% more (95% CI: 3.33, 6.95). Xeno showed 4.14% less bone formation than BCP (95% CI: -6.38, -1.90). AB ranked highest for new bone formation, followed by AL, BCP, TCP, and Xeno. Residual graft material was highest in Xeno (6.21%; 95% CI: 2.81, 9.61). CONCLUSION: • BCP demonstrated sufficient new bone formation, outperforming xenografts in both bone formation and residual graft material. While autografts and allografts exhibited superior bone regeneration, BCP remains an effective option for bone augmentation treatments.
目的:• 通过网络荟萃分析(NMA),系统地确定与其他骨替代材料(BSM)相比,双相磷酸钙(BCP)作为骨替代材料在牙种植治疗中促进新骨形成的有效性。 材料与方法:• 遵循PRISMA-NMA指南,纳入比较BCP与其他BSM用于侧窦提升和牙种植组织形态计量学新骨形成的随机对照试验(RCT)。研究从MEDLINE、Cochrane、Scopus和Embase(截至2024年11月)中检索,通过Cochrane偏倚风险2(RoB2.0)工具评估质量。分析包括使用随机效应模型的直接和网络荟萃分析,通过SUCRA分数确定治疗排名。PROSPERO注册号为CRD42024607526。 结果:• 在268项研究中,11项符合标准,涵盖283例患者和362次使用自体骨(AB)、异体骨(AL)、β-磷酸三钙(TCP)、BCP和异种骨(Xeno)的窦提升。NMA显示,AB比BCP新骨形成多12.33%(95%CI:10.74,13.93),AL多5.14%(95%CI:3.33,6.95)。Xeno比BCP骨形成少4.14%(95%CI:-6.38,-1.90)。AB在新骨形成方面排名最高,其次是AL、BCP、TCP和Xeno。异种骨中残留移植材料最高(6.21%;95%CI:2.81,9.61)。 结论:• BCP显示出足够的新骨形成,在骨形成和残留移植材料方面均优于异种骨。虽然自体骨和异体骨表现出更好的骨再生能力,但BCP仍然是骨增量治疗的有效选择。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014-5-13
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2010
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-4-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-12-22
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-1-9
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025-6
Biomimetics (Basel). 2024-11-12
J Clin Epidemiol. 2024-12
J Orthop Translat. 2024-5-10
Hand Clin. 2024-2