Suppr超能文献

牙种植患者的钛过敏:对1500例连续患者的临床研究。

Titanium allergy in dental implant patients: a clinical study on 1500 consecutive patients.

作者信息

Sicilia Alberto, Cuesta Susana, Coma Gerardo, Arregui Ignacio, Guisasola Cristina, Ruiz Eduardo, Maestro Antonio

机构信息

Clinica Sicilia, Oviedo, Spain.

出版信息

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Aug;19(8):823-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01544.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In dentistry, allergic reactions to Ti implants have not been studied, nor considered by professionals. Placing permanent metal dental implants in allergic patients can provoke type IV or I reactions. Several symptoms have been described, from skin rashes and implant failure, to non-specific immune suppression.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to evaluate the presence of titanium allergy by the anamnesis and examination of patients, together with the selective use of cutaneous and epicutaneous testing, in patients treated with or intending to receive dental implants of such material.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty-five subjects out of 1500 implant patients treated and/or examined (2002-2004) were selected for Ti allergy analysis. Sixteen presented allergic symptoms after implant placement or unexplained implant failures [allergy compatible response group (ACRG)], while 19 had a history of other allergies, or were heavily Ti exposed during implant surgeries or had explained implant failures [predisposing factors group (PFG)]. Thirty-five controls were randomly selected (CG) in the Allergy Centre. Cutaneous and epicutaneous tests were carried out.

RESULTS

Nine out of the 1500 patients displayed positive (+) reactions to Ti allergy tests (0.6%): eight in the ACRG (50%), one in the PFG (5.3%)(P=0.009) and zero in the control group. Five positives were unexplained implant failures (five out of eight).

CONCLUSIONS

Ti allergy can be detected in dental implant patients, even though its estimated prevalence is low (0.6%). A significantly higher risk of positive allergic reaction was found in patients showing post-op allergy compatible response (ACRG), in which cases allergy tests could be recommended.

摘要

背景

在牙科领域,对钛植入物的过敏反应尚未得到研究,专业人员也未予以考虑。在过敏患者体内植入永久性金属牙科植入物可能引发IV型或I型反应。已经描述了多种症状,从皮疹和植入物失败到非特异性免疫抑制。

目的

我们的目的是通过对患者进行问诊和检查,并选择性地使用皮肤和皮上试验,来评估接受或打算接受此类材料牙科植入物治疗的患者中钛过敏的情况。

材料与方法

在1500例接受治疗和/或检查的植入患者(2002 - 2004年)中,选取35名受试者进行钛过敏分析。16名患者在植入后出现过敏症状或出现无法解释的植入物失败[过敏兼容反应组(ACRG)],而19名患者有其他过敏史,或在植入手术期间大量接触钛,或有已解释的植入物失败情况[易感因素组(PFG)]。在过敏中心随机选取35名对照者(CG)。进行了皮肤和皮上试验。

结果

1500例患者中有9例对钛过敏试验呈阳性(+)反应(0.6%):ACRG组中有8例(50%),PFG组中有1例(5.3%)(P = 0.009),对照组中为零例。5例阳性为无法解释的植入物失败(8例中的5例)。

结论

尽管估计牙科植入患者中钛过敏的患病率较低(0.6%),但仍可检测到。在术后出现过敏兼容反应的患者(ACRG)中,发现阳性过敏反应的风险显著更高,在这些病例中可建议进行过敏试验。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验