Diener Hans-Christoph
Department of Neurology, University of Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, D-45122 Essen, Germany.
Int J Stroke. 2006 Feb;1(1):4-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2005.00016.x.
Patients with transient ischemic attack (TIA) or ischemic stroke carry a risk of recurrent stroke of between 5% and 20% per year. In patients with TIA or ischemic stroke of non-cardiac origin, antiplatelet drugs are able to decrease the relative risk of stroke by 11-15% and the risk of stroke, myocardial infarction, and vascular death by 15-22%. Aspirin is the most widely used drug. It is affordable and effective. Low doses of 50-325 mg aspirin are as effective as high doses and cause less gastrointestinal side-effects. The combination of aspirin with slow-release dipyridamole is superior to aspirin alone for stroke prevention but not for the prevention of cardiac events. The risk of major bleeding complications is not increased with the combination, which suggests that dipyridamole might act in another way than as antiplatelet drug. Clopidogrel is not superior to aspirin in unselected stroke patients but is superior in patients at high risk of recurrence. The combination of aspirin plus clopidogrel is not more effective than clopidogrel alone, but carries a higher bleeding risk. The most effective antiplatelet drugs, the GP IIb/IIIa antagonists, are not superior to aspirin and carry a higher risk of bleeding. These results indicate that any antiplatelet therapy with a more potent drug than aspirin will only have a marginally higher efficacy, which might be offset by a higher bleeding rate. Therefore, selection of patients who might benefit from antiplatelet therapy other than aspirin is important.
短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)或缺血性卒中患者每年有5%至20%的复发卒中风险。在非心源性TIA或缺血性卒中患者中,抗血小板药物能够将卒中相对风险降低11% - 15%,并将卒中、心肌梗死和血管性死亡风险降低15% - 22%。阿司匹林是使用最广泛的药物。它价格低廉且有效。50 - 325毫克的低剂量阿司匹林与高剂量一样有效,且胃肠道副作用更少。阿司匹林与缓释双嘧达莫联合使用在预防卒中方面优于单用阿司匹林,但在预防心脏事件方面并非如此。联合使用时大出血并发症风险并未增加,这表明双嘧达莫可能以不同于抗血小板药物的方式起作用。在未选择的卒中患者中,氯吡格雷并不优于阿司匹林,但在复发高风险患者中更具优势。阿司匹林加氯吡格雷的联合用药并不比单用氯吡格雷更有效,但出血风险更高。最有效的抗血小板药物,即糖蛋白IIb/IIIa拮抗剂,并不优于阿司匹林,且出血风险更高。这些结果表明,任何比阿司匹林更强效的抗血小板治疗仅会有略微更高的疗效,而这可能会被更高的出血率所抵消。因此,选择可能从非阿司匹林抗血小板治疗中获益的患者很重要。