Verry M, Panak E, Cazenave J P
Sanofi Pharma, Gentilly, France.
Nouv Rev Fr Hematol (1978). 1994 Jun;36(3):213-28.
Prevention of stroke is a crucial health care issue, as stroke is the third cause of death and the first cause of major disability in developed countries. The established role of platelet aggregation in TIA or minor and major ischaemic stroke has provided the rationale for many randomized trials of antiplatelet agents (aspirin, sulfinpyrazone, dipyridamole alone or in combination with aspirin, suloctidil, ticlopidine). The recent Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration (APT) meta-analysis (1994) based on 142 trials involving 100,000 vascular patients confirmed the data of the previous overview (1988). Aspirin, the only drug evaluated for primary prevention of ischaemic events, is not indicated for safety reasons in subjects at low risk of occlusive disease. Compared to control, antiplatelet therapy, notably aspirin which is by far the most widely used agent in trials, provides a 27% risk reduction of stroke, myocardial infarction or vascular death in patients suffering from ischaemic vascular events and a 22% risk reduction of these outcomes in patients having experienced a prior TIA/stroke. Aspirin (around 325 mg/day) and ticlopidine (500 mg/day) are currently the reference drugs for secondary prevention in cerebrovascular patients. The long term efficacy of ticlopidine, a specific antiaggregating agent, has been evaluated in two North American trials involving more than 4,000 patients. TASS showed ticlopidine to be significantly more effective in reducing the incidence of fatal or nonfatal stroke and death than aspirin in patients with TIA or minor stroke. The relative risk reductions over aspirin, the first year of greatest risk, were 41% for stroke and death and 46% for fatal or nonfatal stroke. CATS showed that ticlopidine compared with placebo induces a significant 30% relative risk reduction of stroke, myocardial infarction and vascular death over three years in patients who had suffered a recent thromboembolic stroke. The above results elicit two important issues: the optimal dose of aspirin and its tolerability compared to ticlopidine. The three controlled trials (UK-TIA, SALT, Dutch TIA) which have compared high (> or = 1 g/day) and low dose aspirin (< or = 300 mg/day) or various low doses of aspirin did not give a definite answer on the efficacy of low or very low (30 or 75 mg/day) doses of aspirin for reducing the risk of vascular outcomes in patients with stroke precursors. Even with low doses of aspirin there was still a risk of severe gastrointestinal bleeding, although minor side effects were less frequent.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
预防中风是一个至关重要的医疗保健问题,因为在发达国家,中风是第三大死因和主要残疾的首要原因。血小板聚集在短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)或轻度及重度缺血性中风中所起的既定作用,为许多抗血小板药物(阿司匹林、磺吡酮、双嘧达莫单独使用或与阿司匹林联合使用、舒洛地尔、噻氯匹定)的随机试验提供了理论依据。最近的抗血小板试验协作组(APT)1994年基于142项试验涉及10万名血管疾病患者的荟萃分析证实了先前综述(1988年)的数据。阿司匹林是唯一被评估用于缺血性事件一级预防的药物,出于安全原因,在闭塞性疾病低风险人群中不适用。与对照组相比,抗血小板治疗,尤其是阿司匹林(在试验中是使用最广泛的药物),可使缺血性血管事件患者中风、心肌梗死或血管性死亡的风险降低27%,使既往有TIA/中风的患者这些结局的风险降低22%。阿司匹林(约325毫克/天)和噻氯匹定(500毫克/天)目前是脑血管疾病患者二级预防的参考药物。噻氯匹定是一种特异性抗聚集剂,其长期疗效已在两项涉及4000多名患者的北美试验中进行了评估。TASS研究表明,在TIA或轻度中风患者中,噻氯匹定在降低致命或非致命性中风及死亡发生率方面比阿司匹林显著更有效。在风险最高的第一年,与阿司匹林相比,噻氯匹定使中风和死亡的相对风险降低41%,使致命或非致命性中风的相对风险降低46%。CATS研究表明,与安慰剂相比,噻氯匹定在近期发生血栓栓塞性中风的患者中,三年内可使中风、心肌梗死和血管性死亡的相对风险显著降低30%。上述结果引发了两个重要问题:阿司匹林的最佳剂量及其与噻氯匹定相比的耐受性。三项比较高剂量(≥1克/天)和低剂量阿司匹林(≤300毫克/天)或不同低剂量阿司匹林的对照试验(UK-TIA、SALT、荷兰TIA试验),对于低剂量或极低剂量(30或75毫克/天)阿司匹林降低中风先兆患者血管结局风险的疗效未给出明确答案。即使使用低剂量阿司匹林,仍有严重胃肠道出血的风险,尽管轻微副作用的发生频率较低。(摘要截选至400字)