Blake Mariano G, Boccia Mariano M, Baratti Carlos M
Laboratorio de Neurofarmacología de los Procesos de Memoria, Cátedra de Farmacología, Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Neurosci Lett. 2008 Oct 17;444(1):102-5. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.08.010. Epub 2008 Aug 8.
For several decades, one-trial inhibitory avoidance (IA) tasks have been used in the study of memory processing. In the present work, the effects of diazepam (DZP) (0.5mg/kg) and picrotoxin (PIC) (0.3mg/kg) on memory retrieval were assessed using two variants of a step-through IA situation in CF-1 mice. In the first variant, animals get into a dark compartment from an open illuminated platform (platform), whereas in the other, from an enclosed illuminated one (box). PIC impaired retention performance in the "platform-type" IA, but not in the "box-type". DZP enhanced retention performance in both types of IA task. These results evidence critical differences between the two step-through inhibitory avoidance tasks used, that might be relevant not only for retention performance during memory retrieval, but also for the theoretical interpretations and conclusions obtained from behavioral results.
几十年来,一次性抑制性回避(IA)任务一直用于记忆处理的研究。在本研究中,使用CF-1小鼠的两种穿梭式IA情境变体,评估了地西泮(DZP)(0.5mg/kg)和印防己毒素(PIC)(0.3mg/kg)对记忆提取的影响。在第一种变体中,动物从开放的光照平台(平台)进入黑暗隔室,而在另一种变体中,从封闭的光照隔室(箱子)进入。PIC损害了“平台型”IA中的记忆保持表现,但在“箱子型”中没有。DZP增强了两种类型IA任务中的记忆保持表现。这些结果证明了所使用的两种穿梭式抑制性回避任务之间的关键差异,这可能不仅与记忆提取过程中的记忆保持表现有关,还与从行为结果中获得的理论解释和结论有关。