Suppr超能文献

在重复活检时诊断出的前列腺癌体积较小,且高级别癌的可能性较低。

Prostate cancers diagnosed at repeat biopsy are smaller and less likely to be high grade.

作者信息

Tan Nelly, Lane Brian R, Li Jianbo, Moussa Ayman S, Soriano Meghan, Jones J Stephen

机构信息

Glickman Urologic and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

J Urol. 2008 Oct;180(4):1325-9; discussion 1329. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.06.022. Epub 2008 Aug 15.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We investigated whether prostate cancer diagnosed on initial prostate biopsy had worse pathological outcomes compared to that diagnosed on repeat prostate biopsy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed 905 newly diagnosed prostate cancer cases from 2000 to 2007. Patients were stratified by the number of previous biopsies, including the initial biopsy in 690, and 1 and 2 or greater negative previous biopsies in 142 and 73, respectively. We analyzed Gleason sum, number of cores taken, percent of positive cores and bilaterality of prostate cancer. Clinically insignificant cancers were defined according to prostate specific antigen density 0.4 ng/ml or less, 3 or fewer positive cores, 50% or less of maximum cancer in any core and Gleason sum 6 or less.

RESULTS

Prostate cancer was diagnosed in 57%, 23% and 21% of cases in the initial, and 1 and 2 or greater negative previous biopsies groups, respectively. Initial prostate biopsy showed a higher number and percent of positive cores, and the maximum percent of prostate cancer involved in a core. However, the Gleason pattern distribution differed significantly in the 3 groups with the highest percent (14%) of Gleason sum 8 or greater in the subset with 2 or greater negative previous biopsies (p <0.01). On multivariate analysis accounting for prostate specific antigen, digital rectal examination, age and biopsy schema the number of previous biopsies was an independent predictor of the number and percent of positive cores, maximum prostate cancer involved in a core, and bilaterality (p <0.01). Only prostate specific antigen, digital rectal examination and age but not the number of previous biopsies independently predicted Gleason sum (p <0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Prostate cancer diagnosed on initial prostate biopsy had higher volume. However, there were a significant number of high grade prostate cancers detected on the third or greater prostate biopsy, underscoring the importance of repeat prostate biopsy in the setting of increased or increasing prostate specific antigen despite negative previous prostate biopsy.

摘要

目的

我们研究了与在重复前列腺活检时诊断出的前列腺癌相比,初次前列腺活检时诊断出的前列腺癌是否具有更差的病理结果。

材料与方法

我们回顾了2000年至2007年905例新诊断的前列腺癌病例。患者根据先前活检的次数进行分层,包括初次活检690例,先前1次阴性活检142例,以及先前2次或更多次阴性活检73例。我们分析了 Gleason 总分、取材的穿刺针数、阳性穿刺针百分比以及前列腺癌的双侧性。临床意义不显著的癌症根据前列腺特异性抗原密度0.4 ng/ml或更低、阳性穿刺针数3针或更少、任何一个穿刺针中最大癌灶占比50%或更低以及Gleason总分6分或更低来定义。

结果

初次活检组、先前1次阴性活检组和先前2次或更多次阴性活检组中前列腺癌的诊断率分别为57%、23%和21%。初次前列腺活检显示阳性穿刺针数和百分比更高,且一个穿刺针中前列腺癌累及的最大百分比更高。然而,三组的Gleason模式分布存在显著差异,先前2次或更多次阴性活检亚组中Gleason总分8分或更高的比例最高(14%)(p<0.01)。在对前列腺特异性抗原、直肠指检、年龄和活检方案进行多变量分析时,先前活检的次数是阳性穿刺针数和百分比、一个穿刺针中最大前列腺癌累及情况以及双侧性的独立预测因素(p<0.01)。只有前列腺特异性抗原、直肠指检和年龄而非先前活检的次数能独立预测Gleason总分(p<0.01)。

结论

初次前列腺活检时诊断出的前列腺癌体积更大。然而,在第三次或更多次前列腺活检时检测到了大量高级别前列腺癌,这突出了在先前前列腺活检为阴性但前列腺特异性抗原升高或持续升高的情况下重复前列腺活检的重要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验