Kurban Mark R, Peric Miroslav, Bales Barney L
Department of Physics and Astronomy and The Center for Supramolecular Studies, California State University at Northridge, Northridge, California 91330, USA.
J Chem Phys. 2008 Aug 14;129(6):064501. doi: 10.1063/1.2958922.
Bimolecular collisions between perdeuterated 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-oxopiperidine-l-oxyl molecules in three alkanes have been studied by measuring the electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectral changes induced by spin exchange. We define an "encounter" to be a first-time collision followed by a series of re-encounters prior to the diffusing pair's escaping each other's presence. The present work stems from a recent proposal [B. L. Bales et al., J. Phys. Chem. A 107, 9086 (2003)] that an unexpected linear dependence of the spin-exchange-induced EPR line shifts on spin-exchange frequency can be explained by re-encounters of the same probe pair during one encounter. By employing nonlinear least-squares fitting, full use of the information available from the spectral changes allows us to study encounters and re-encounters separately. The encounter rate constants appear to be dominated by hydrodynamic forces, forming a common curve for hexane, decane, and hexadecane when plotted against T/eta, where eta is the shear viscosity. Unexpectedly, encounters are not dependent on the ratio mu = a/a(s), where a and a(s) are the van der Waals radii of the nitroxide probe and the solvent, respectively. It is argued that the near coincidence of the resulting encounter rate constant with the hydrodynamic prediction is likely due to a near cancellation of terms in the general diffusion coefficient. Thus, the semblance of hydrodynamic behavior is coincidental rather than intrinsic. In contrast, the mean times between re-encounters do depend on the relative sizes of probe and solvent. For hexane at lower temperatures, the Stokes-Einstein equation apparently describes re-encounters well; however, at higher temperatures and for decane and hexadecane, departures from the hydrodynamic prediction become larger as mu becomes smaller. This is in qualitative agreement with the theory of microscopic diffusion of Hynes et al. [J. Chem. Phys. 70, 1456 (1979)]. These departures are well correlated with the free volume available in the solvent; thus, the mean times between re-encounters form a common curve when plotted versus the free volume. Because free volume is manifested macroscopically by the isothermal compressibility, it is expected and observed that the re-encounter rate also forms a common curve across all three solvents when plotted with respect to compressibility. The existence of a common curve for alkanes raises the prospect of using EPR to determine the compressibility of substances such as fossil fuels and biological membranes.
通过测量自旋交换引起的电子顺磁共振(EPR)光谱变化,研究了在三种烷烃中全氘代2,2,6,6 - 四甲基 - 4 - 氧代哌啶 - 1 - 氧基自由基分子之间的双分子碰撞。我们将“相遇”定义为首次碰撞,随后是扩散对在彼此分离之前的一系列再次相遇。目前的工作源于最近的一项提议[B. L. Bales等人,《物理化学杂志A》107, 9086 (2003)],即自旋交换诱导的EPR谱线位移对自旋交换频率的意外线性依赖性可以通过同一探测对在一次相遇期间的再次相遇来解释。通过采用非线性最小二乘法拟合,充分利用光谱变化中可用的信息使我们能够分别研究相遇和再次相遇。相遇速率常数似乎主要由流体动力学力主导,当与T/η(其中η是剪切粘度)作图时,己烷、癸烷和十六烷形成一条共同曲线。出乎意料的是,相遇并不依赖于比率μ = a/a(s),其中a和a(s)分别是氮氧化物探针和溶剂的范德华半径。有人认为,所得相遇速率常数与流体动力学预测的近乎一致可能是由于一般扩散系数中的项几乎相互抵消。因此,流体动力学行为的表象是巧合而非内在的。相比之下,再次相遇之间的平均时间确实依赖于探针和溶剂的相对大小。对于较低温度下的己烷,斯托克斯 - 爱因斯坦方程显然能很好地描述再次相遇;然而,在较高温度下以及对于癸烷和十六烷,随着μ变小,与流体动力学预测的偏差变得更大。这与Hynes等人的微观扩散理论[《化学物理杂志》70, 1456 (1979)]在定性上是一致的。这些偏差与溶剂中可用的自由体积密切相关;因此,当与自由体积作图时,再次相遇之间的平均时间形成一条共同曲线。由于自由体积在宏观上由等温压缩性体现,预计并观察到当相对于压缩性作图时,再次相遇速率在所有三种溶剂中也形成一条共同曲线。烷烃共同曲线的存在增加了使用EPR来确定诸如化石燃料和生物膜等物质的压缩性的可能性。