Suppr超能文献

预计会有延迟的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的再灌注选择

Reperfusion options in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients with expected delays.

作者信息

Larson David M, Henry Timothy D

机构信息

Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation at Abbott Northwestern Hospital, 920 East 28th Street, Suite 40, Minneapolis, MN 55407, USA.

出版信息

Curr Cardiol Rep. 2008 Sep;10(5):415-23. doi: 10.1007/s11886-008-0065-6.

Abstract

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is the optimal reperfusion strategy for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients when performed in a timely manner by experienced providers. Unfortunately, only 25% of US hospitals have percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) capability. Transfer for PPCI has also been shown to improve outcomes if transfer times are short and PCI can be performed within 90 minutes. However, many STEMI patients cannot be transferred in a timely fashion because of long distances, adverse weather, or process-of-care delays. Recent data support strategies that combine fibrinolysis with transfer for PCI under these circumstances. The critical issue that is still debated is the timing of PCI (immediate vs delayed vs rescue). The significance of time to reperfusion to mortality is important but less critical for PCI than for fibrinolysis, but time still matters. To optimize time to reperfusion for STEMI patients, all hospitals need to have predetermined protocols in place based on hospital characteristics and proximity to a catheterization laboratory.

摘要

对于ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者,由经验丰富的医疗人员及时进行的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PPCI)是最佳的再灌注策略。不幸的是,美国只有25%的医院具备经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)能力。如果转运时间短且能在90分钟内进行PCI,转运接受PPCI治疗也已显示可改善预后。然而,由于距离远、恶劣天气或治疗过程延误,许多STEMI患者无法及时转运。近期数据支持在这些情况下将溶栓与转运至PCI相结合的策略。仍在争论的关键问题是PCI的时机(即刻、延迟或补救)。再灌注时间对死亡率的意义很重要,但对PCI而言不如对溶栓那么关键,不过时间仍然很重要。为了优化STEMI患者的再灌注时间,所有医院都需要根据医院特点和与导管室的距离制定预先确定的方案。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验