Freedman Edward G, Cecala Aaron L
Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Prog Brain Res. 2008;171:323-30. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)00647-X.
When the head is prevented from moving, it has been clearly demonstrated that the horizontal and vertical components of oblique saccades are not independently produced. The duration of the smaller of the two components is stretched in time to match the duration of the larger component. Several hypotheses have been proposed and each can account for the observed interaction between horizontal and vertical saccade components. When the head is free to move, gaze shifts can be accomplished by combining eye and head movements. During repeated gaze shifts of the same amplitude, as head contribution increases, saccade amplitude declines but saccade duration increases. Thus, the expected relationship between duration and amplitude of saccadic eye movements can be reversed. We have used this altered relationship to determine whether the duration of the vertical saccade component is affected by the amplitude or the duration of the horizontal component. We find that the relative amplitudes of horizontal and vertical saccades cannot account for the observed temporal stretching: vertical component duration increases despite a decrease in the amplitude of the horizontal component. These results are likely inconsistent with models that rely on calculating the vector or relative component amplitudes to account for component stretching.
当头部运动受到限制时,已有明确证据表明,斜向扫视的水平和垂直分量并非独立产生。两个分量中较小的那个分量的持续时间会在时间上被拉长,以与较大分量的持续时间相匹配。已经提出了几种假设,每种假设都能解释观察到的水平和垂直扫视分量之间的相互作用。当头部可以自由移动时,注视转移可以通过眼睛和头部运动的结合来完成。在相同幅度的重复注视转移过程中,随着头部贡献的增加,扫视幅度减小,但扫视持续时间增加。因此,眼跳运动持续时间与幅度之间的预期关系可能会颠倒。我们利用这种改变后的关系来确定垂直扫视分量的持续时间是否受水平分量的幅度或持续时间的影响。我们发现,水平和垂直扫视的相对幅度并不能解释观察到的时间拉伸现象:尽管水平分量的幅度减小,但垂直分量的持续时间仍会增加。这些结果可能与依靠计算矢量或相对分量幅度来解释分量拉伸的模型不一致。