Riginos Corinna, Grace James B
Department of Plant Sciences, University of California at Davis, Davis, California 95616, USA.
Ecology. 2008 Aug;89(8):2228-38. doi: 10.1890/07-1250.1.
Herbivores choose their habitats both to maximize forage intake and to minimize their risk of predation. For African savanna herbivores, the available habitats range in woody cover from open areas with few trees to dense, almost-closed woodlands. This variation in woody cover or density can have a number of consequences for herbaceous species composition, cover, and productivity, as well as for ease of predator detection and avoidance. Here, we consider two alternative possibilities: first, that tree density affects the herbaceous vegetation, with concomitant "bottom-up" effects on herbivore habitat preferences; or, second, that tree density affects predator visibility, mediating "top-down" effects of predators on herbivore habitat preferences. We sampled sites spanning a 10-fold range of tree densities in an Acacia drepanolobium-dominated savanna in Laikipia, Kenya, for variation in (1) herbaceous cover, composition, and species richness; (2) wild and domestic herbivore use; and (3) degree of visibility obstruction by the tree layer. We then used structural equation modeling to consider the potential influences that tree density may have on herbivores and herbaceous community properties. Tree density was associated with substantial variation in herbaceous species composition and richness. Cattle exhibited a fairly uniform use of the landscape, whereas wild herbivores, with the exception of elephants, exhibited a strong preference for areas of low tree density. Model results suggest that this was not a response to variation in herbaceous-community characteristics, but rather a response to the greater visibility associated with more open places. Elephants, in contrast, preferred areas with higher densities of trees, apparently because of greater forage availability. These results suggest that, for all but the largest species, top-down behavioral effects of predator avoidance on herbivores are mediated by tree density. This, in turn, appears to have cascading effects on the herbaceous vegetation. These results shed light on one of the major features of the "landscape of fear" in which African savanna herbivores exist.
食草动物选择栖息地,既要使草料摄入量最大化,又要将被捕食的风险降至最低。对于非洲稀树草原的食草动物来说,可用栖息地的树木覆盖程度各不相同,从树木稀少的开阔区域到茂密的、几乎封闭的林地。这种树木覆盖或密度的变化会对草本植物的种类组成、覆盖度和生产力产生一系列影响,同时也会影响被捕食者发现和躲避的难易程度。在这里,我们考虑两种不同的可能性:第一,树木密度影响草本植被,随之产生对食草动物栖息地偏好的“自下而上”的影响;第二,树木密度影响捕食者的可见度,从而调节捕食者对食草动物栖息地偏好的“自上而下”的影响。我们在肯尼亚莱基皮亚以阿拉伯金合欢为主的稀树草原上,对树木密度相差10倍的地点进行了采样,以研究以下方面的变化:(1)草本植物的覆盖度、组成和物种丰富度;(2)野生和家养食草动物的利用情况;(3)树木层造成的视野受阻程度。然后,我们使用结构方程模型来考虑树木密度可能对食草动物和草本群落特性产生的潜在影响。树木密度与草本植物种类组成和丰富度的显著变化有关。牛对整个区域的利用较为均匀,而野生食草动物,除了大象之外,都强烈偏好树木密度低的区域。模型结果表明,这并非对草本群落特征变化的反应,而是对开阔地带视野更开阔的反应。相比之下,大象更喜欢树木密度较高的区域,显然是因为那里有更多的草料。这些结果表明,对于除最大型物种之外的所有物种,捕食者躲避行为对食草动物的“自上而下”的影响是由树木密度介导的。反过来,这似乎对草本植被产生了连锁反应。这些结果揭示了非洲稀树草原食草动物所处的“恐惧景观”的一个主要特征。