Chan Evelyn C Y, Vernon Sally W
Division of General Internal Medicine, The University of Texas-Houston School of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Med Care. 2008 Sep;46(9 Suppl 1):S117-22. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181805e3c.
Colon cancer screening (CRCS) tests are underused. Multiple CRCS options may confuse patients and lead to inaction. E-mail between patients and physicians may raise awareness about CRCS and allow physicians to answer questions about test options.
To develop and implement an electronic intervention, the InterNet LETter (NetLET), to increase interest in and use of CRCS among patients with and without e-mail access at home or work.
During 2004-2005, 97 patients over 49 years old were recruited during a clinic visit. Patients with e-mail at home or work were assigned to the private access arm; patients without e-mail but willing to use the public library system were assigned to the public access arm. Within each arm, patients were randomized to the NetLET or control group. The NetLET consisted of a personalized e-mail from the physician reminding the patient to undergo CRCS and providing a link to a webpage with information about CRCS. Control groups were mailed a reminder letter from their physician. All were mailed a fecal occult blood test (FOBT) kit.
In the public access intervention group, only 1 of 11 patients viewed the NetLET. In the private access intervention group, 10 of 42 viewed it. Eleven of 42 (26%) private access intervention group participants, and 8 of 35 (23%) private access control group participants returned an FOBT. No public access intervention group patients, but 3 of 9 control group patients, returned an FOBT.
We concluded that it was not feasible to implement the NetLET, but reasons for lack of success differed for the private and public access arms.
结肠癌筛查(CRCS)检测未得到充分利用。多种CRCS选项可能会使患者感到困惑并导致他们不作为。患者与医生之间的电子邮件可能会提高对CRCS的认识,并使医生能够回答有关检测选项的问题。
开发并实施一种电子干预措施,即互联网信件(NetLET),以提高在家或工作场所可访问和不可访问电子邮件的患者对CRCS的兴趣并增加其使用。
在2004年至2005年期间,在门诊就诊时招募了97名49岁以上的患者。在家或工作场所可访问电子邮件的患者被分配到私人访问组;没有电子邮件但愿意使用公共图书馆系统的患者被分配到公共访问组。在每个组中,患者被随机分配到NetLET组或对照组。NetLET包括医生发送的个性化电子邮件,提醒患者进行CRCS,并提供一个指向有关CRCS信息网页的链接。对照组收到医生邮寄的提醒信。所有人都收到了一份粪便潜血试验(FOBT)试剂盒。
在公共访问干预组中,11名患者中只有1人查看了NetLET。在私人访问干预组中,42名患者中有10人查看了它。42名(26%)私人访问干预组参与者中的11人,以及35名(23%)私人访问对照组参与者中的8人返还了FOBT。公共访问干预组中没有患者返还FOBT,但对照组的9名患者中有3人返还了FOBT。
我们得出结论,实施NetLET是不可行的,但私人访问组和公共访问组未成功的原因有所不同。