Kamada Shinsuke, Kawamura Yuichiro, Iida Yasuhito, Sato Nobuyuki, Hasebe Naoyuki
Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Respiratory and Neurology Division, Asahikawa Medical College, Hokkaido, Japan.
Int Heart J. 2008 Jul;49(4):493-506. doi: 10.1536/ihj.49.493.
Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for supraventricular arrhythmias results in parasympathetic nervous damage. Recently, RFCA around the pulmonary veins (PVs) has become a standardized curative therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of the present study was to elucidate the relationship between the degree of vagal denervation and RFCA sites, including the PV areas. In 21 dogs, RFCA was performed at the ostium of the right PV (n = 7), ostium of the left PV (n = 7), and posteroseptal site of the right atrium (n = 7). Electrical stimulation of the cervical vagal trunk (ESCV) was performed and the resultant increase in the P-P interval (PPI) observed on the ECG was measured. The PPI was compared between the different RFCA sites. In another 7 animals, the vagal ganglia located in the fat pads that innervate the sinoatrial (SA) node were also stimulated (ESFP), testing the degree of postganglionic damage. The PPI after RFCA was decreased with right PV RFCA whereas there was no change with left PV RFCA. The ESFP yielded a significantly greater decrease in the PPI than the ESCV. The PPI during ESFP was completely blocked by hexamethonium, injected into the fat pad. The ESCV after the hexa-methonium injection did not result in complete disappearance of the PPI. Thus, right PV RFCA markedly damaged the vagal innervation of the SA node, whereas left PV RFCA produced little damage. The major type of damage was partial postganglionic fiber damage. An alternate vagal pathway external to the fat pads is proposed.
用于室上性心律失常的射频导管消融术(RFCA)会导致副交感神经损伤。最近,肺静脉(PV)周围的RFCA已成为心房颤动(AF)的标准化治疗方法。本研究的目的是阐明迷走神经去神经程度与RFCA部位(包括PV区域)之间的关系。在21只犬中,分别在右PV开口处(n = 7)、左PV开口处(n = 7)和右心房后间隔部位(n = 7)进行RFCA。进行颈迷走神经干电刺激(ESCV),并测量心电图上观察到的P-P间期(PPI)的相应增加。比较不同RFCA部位之间的PPI。在另外7只动物中,还刺激了支配窦房结(SA)的位于脂肪垫中的迷走神经节(ESFP),以测试节后损伤程度。RFCA后,右PV RFCA使PPI降低,而左PV RFCA则无变化。ESFP导致的PPI降低比ESCV明显更大。ESFP期间的PPI被注入脂肪垫的六甲铵完全阻断。注射六甲铵后的ESCV并未导致PPI完全消失。因此,右PV RFCA显著损伤了SA结的迷走神经支配,而左PV RFCA造成的损伤很小。主要的损伤类型是节后纤维部分损伤。提出了脂肪垫外部的另一条迷走神经通路。