Suppr超能文献

治疗同意:实践与原则

Consent to treatment: practice vis-à-vis principle.

作者信息

Bastia Binaya Kumar

机构信息

Department of Forensic Medicine, SDM College of Medical Sciences, Sattur, Dharwad, Kamataka 580 009, India.

出版信息

Indian J Med Ethics. 2008 Jul-Sep;5(3):113-4; discussion 115-6. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2008.041.

Abstract

It is a principle recognised not only by our own but by other legal systems that ignorance of the law is no excuse for violating it. This is also expressed in the form of a legal presumption that everyone knows the law. So it is the duty of every person to be acquainted with that part of it which concerns him or her. In recent years there have been a number of malpractice suits based on lack of consent or inadequate consent from the patient for procedures used in treatment. The common meaning of consent is permission, whereas the law perceives it as a contract, that is, an agreement enforceable by law. Keeping this view, the present article aims at highlighting certain misconceptions prevailing regarding consent.

摘要

法律体系中公认的一项原则是,不仅我们自己的法律体系,其他法律体系也认同,对法律的无知不能成为违法的借口。这也以法律推定的形式体现,即每个人都知晓法律。因此,每个人都有责任了解与其自身相关的那部分法律。近年来,出现了一些基于患者对治疗中所采用程序缺乏同意或同意不充分而引发的医疗事故诉讼。同意的通常含义是许可,而法律将其视为一种契约,也就是说,一种可依法强制执行的协议。基于这一观点,本文旨在突出关于同意存在的某些普遍误解。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验