Pintens Valerie, Massonet Caroline, Merckx Rita, Vandecasteele Stefaan, Peetermans Willy E, Knobloch Johannes K-M, Van Eldere Johan
Department of Medical Diagnostics, Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Microbiology, KULeuven, UZ Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, AZ Sint-Jan AV, Ruddershove 10, B-8000 Brugge, Belgium.
Microbiology (Reading). 2008 Sep;154(Pt 9):2827-2836. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2007/015768-0.
Staphylococcal biofilm formation depends on the transcription factor sigma(B). We further investigated the role of sigma(B) in biofilm formation and persistence in vitro and in vivo in a subcutaneous rat model. As expected, expression of all sigma(B) operon genes was transiently higher in the first 6 h of biofilm formation compared to planktonic bacteria, concurrent with a temporary upregulation of icaA and aap expression. However, we also observed a second upregulation of sigB expression in biofilm more than 2 days old without upregulation of icaA or aap. Biofilm formation by Staphylococcus epidermidis strains 8400 and 1457 was compared to that of isogenic mutants with inactivation of rsbU, of rsbUVW and of the entire sigma(B) operon. Both wild-type strains and the constitutively sigB-expressing rsbUVW mutant showed a strong biofilm-positive phenotype. The rsbUVW mutant biofilm was, however, thinner and more evenly spread than the wild-type biofilm. Inactivation of SigB in the rsbUVWsigB mutant or mutation of the positive regulator RsbU reduced both the number of sessile bacteria and polysaccharide intercellular adhesin (PIA) synthesis. These differences between the wild-types and their respective mutants appeared after 6 h in in vitro biofilms but only after 4 days in in vivo biofilms. Our results provide additional evidence for a role for sigma(B) in biofilm formation. They also suggest a role for sigma(B) in biofilm maturation and stability that is independent of PIA or accumulation-associated protein (Aap) and point to significant differences in the temporal development between in vitro and in vivo biofilms.
葡萄球菌生物膜的形成依赖于转录因子σ(B)。我们进一步研究了σ(B)在体外生物膜形成以及在大鼠皮下模型体内生物膜形成和持续存在过程中的作用。正如预期的那样,与浮游细菌相比,在生物膜形成的最初6小时内,所有σ(B)操纵子基因的表达均短暂升高,同时icaA和aap的表达也暂时上调。然而,我们还观察到,在超过2天的生物膜中,sigB表达再次上调,而icaA或aap并未上调。将表皮葡萄球菌菌株8400和1457的生物膜形成与rsbU、rsbUVW以及整个σ(B)操纵子失活的同基因突变体进行了比较。野生型菌株和组成型表达sigB的rsbUVW突变体均表现出强烈的生物膜阳性表型。然而,rsbUVW突变体的生物膜比野生型生物膜更薄且分布更均匀。在rsbUVWsigB突变体中使SigB失活或使正向调节因子RsbU发生突变,均可减少固着细菌的数量以及胞间多糖黏附素(PIA)的合成。野生型及其各自突变体之间的这些差异在体外生物膜中6小时后出现,但在体内生物膜中4天后才出现。我们的结果为σ(B)在生物膜形成中的作用提供了更多证据。它们还表明,σ(B)在生物膜成熟和稳定性方面发挥作用,且该作用独立于PIA或积累相关蛋白(Aap),并指出体外和体内生物膜在时间发展上存在显著差异。