Suppr超能文献

一小时尿垫试验对女性尿失禁预测价值的敏感性和特异性。

Sensitivity and specificity of one-hour pad test as a predictive value for female urinary incontinence.

作者信息

Costantini Elisabetta, Lazzeri Massimo, Bini Vittorio, Giannantoni Antonella, Mearini Luigi, Porena Massimo

机构信息

Department of Medical-Surgical Specialties and Public Health, Urology and Andrology Section, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

出版信息

Urol Int. 2008;81(2):153-9. doi: 10.1159/000144053. Epub 2008 Aug 29.

Abstract

AIM

To analyze the sensitivity and specificity of the 1-hour pad test, as suggested by the International Continence Society, in the diagnosis of female urinary incontinence.

METHODS

158 female patients, with or without urinary incontinence, underwent a 1-hour pad test. The pad test was assessed as positive or negative and pad weight was recorded. Uni- and multivariate analysis investigated correlation with age, body mass index (BMI), symptoms, prolapse grade, urinary incontinence grade and type, number of pads daily, urodynamic variables and Urogenital Distress Inventory and Incontinence Impact Quality of Life questionnaires.

RESULTS

A positive 1-hour pad test was significantly associated with urinary incontinence grade, with a positive stress test, with detrusor overactivity (DO), urine leakage and a positive Valsalva leak point pressure at urodynamics. The association between presence/absence of incontinence and DO, stress test, urine leakage and pad weight had 83% sensitivity and 89% specificity in predicting urinary incontinence. When the 1-hour pad test result was added to stress test and urine leakage versus presence/absence of incontinence, the sensitivity was 90%, and specificity 65%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data seem to confirm the 1-hour pad test has poor predictive value in the diagnosis of female urinary incontinence when associated to stress test and urine leakage.

摘要

目的

分析国际尿控协会建议的1小时护垫试验在女性尿失禁诊断中的敏感性和特异性。

方法

158例有或无尿失禁的女性患者接受了1小时护垫试验。护垫试验评估为阳性或阴性,并记录护垫重量。单因素和多因素分析研究了其与年龄、体重指数(BMI)、症状、脱垂分级、尿失禁分级和类型、每日护垫使用数量、尿动力学变量以及泌尿生殖系统困扰量表和尿失禁影响生活质量问卷的相关性。

结果

1小时护垫试验阳性与尿失禁分级、压力试验阳性、逼尿肌过度活动(DO)、漏尿以及尿动力学检查时腹压增加漏尿点压力阳性显著相关。尿失禁的有无与DO、压力试验、漏尿和护垫重量之间的关联在预测尿失禁方面具有83%的敏感性和89%的特异性。当将小时护垫试验结果与压力试验和漏尿情况相结合用于预测尿失禁的有无时,敏感性为90%,特异性为65%。

结论

我们的数据似乎证实,当与压力试验和漏尿情况相结合时,1小时护垫试验在女性尿失禁诊断中的预测价值较差。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验