Department of Surgery, Royal Hobart Hospital, Tasmania, Australia.
Obes Surg. 2009 Dec;19(12):1702-6. doi: 10.1007/s11695-008-9672-y.
Band slippage is a significant complication of laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) surgery for the treatment of morbid obesity. This involves prolapse of part of the stomach, with varying degrees of gastric obstruction. The original perigastric technique (PGT) was associated with slippage rates of up to 25%. The pars flaccida technique (PFT) is the more commonly used technique today, reducing slippage rates to as low as 1.4%. We report a technique not previously described, the modified PFT with the use of mesh, and compare slippage rates between these three techniques for band placement.
A prospectively entered, retrospective review of 1,446 consecutive patients undergoing LAGB by a single surgeon was undertaken. Patients were divided into five consecutive groups: PGT learning curve (PGTLC) (n = 68), PGT (n = 19), mesh PFT (MPFT) (n = 415), mesh plication PFT (MPPFT) (n = 131), and MPPFT with inadequate follow-up (n = 813). Patient characteristics, band slippage, and other complication rates were compared between groups.
The slippage rates for each group were: PGTLC (10%), PGT (5%), MPFT (0.8%), and MPPFT (0%). This demonstrated a statistically significant difference between the slippage rates for each group (p < 0.001). Combining the MPFT and MPPFT groups, there was a statistically significant difference in band slippage compared to the PGT group (p < 0.001).
While the MPFT is associated with low band slippage rates, the MPPFT results in further reductions in band slippage. The routine use of this modification to the MPFT is safe and may reduce operative morbidity. A randomized comparison of these techniques is warranted.
腹腔镜可调节胃束带(LAGB)手术治疗病态肥胖症的一个显著并发症是束带滑脱。这涉及胃的一部分脱垂,伴有不同程度的胃梗阻。最初的胃周技术(PGT)与高达 25%的滑脱率有关。今天更常用的技术是疏松部技术(PFT),将滑脱率降低到低至 1.4%。我们报告一种以前未描述的技术,即使用网片改良的 PFT,并比较这三种技术放置束带的滑脱率。
对一位外科医生连续进行的 1446 例 LAGB 患者进行前瞻性、回顾性研究。患者被分为五个连续组:PGT 学习曲线(PGTCL)(n = 68)、PGT(n = 19)、网片 PFT(MPFT)(n = 415)、网片折叠 PFT(MPPFT)(n = 131)和 MPPFT 随访不足(n = 813)。比较组间患者特征、束带滑脱和其他并发症发生率。
每个组的滑脱率分别为:PGTCL(10%)、PGT(5%)、MPFT(0.8%)和 MPPFT(0%)。这表明每组之间的滑脱率存在统计学显著差异(p < 0.001)。将 MPFT 和 MPPFT 组结合起来,与 PGT 组相比,束带滑脱有统计学显著差异(p < 0.001)。
虽然 MPFT 与低束带滑脱率相关,但 MPPFT 可进一步降低束带滑脱率。这种改良的 MPFT 的常规应用是安全的,可以降低手术发病率。有必要对这些技术进行随机比较。