Toogood Paul A, Skalak Anthony, Cooperman Daniel R
Department of Orthopaedics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine and University Hospitals Case Medical Center, 2423 Overlook Road, Apartment 7, Cleveland Heights, OH 44106, USA.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Apr;467(4):876-85. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0473-3. Epub 2008 Aug 29.
In this study, we developed a complete description of the morphology of the proximal femur. Then, using this framework, we (1) determined normal population means, standard deviations, and ranges; (2) established differences among subpopulations; and (3) showed correlations among the various measurements. To accomplish these objectives, we analyzed 375 adult femurs. Specimens were digitally photographed in standardized positions, measurements being obtained using ImageJ software. Three parameters of the head-neck relationship were assessed. Translation was examined through four raw offset measurements (anterior, posterior, superior, inferior) used to calculate anterior-posterior and superior-inferior ratios. Rotation was investigated through anteroposterior (AP) and lateral physeal angles. Concavity was examined using alpha, beta, gamma, and delta angles. Two parameters of the neck-shaft relationship were assessed, neck version and angle of inclination. Average anterior-posterior and superior-inferior ratios were 1.14 and 0.90. Average AP and lateral physeal angles were 74.33 degrees and 81.83 degrees , respectively. Averages for alpha, beta, gamma, and delta angles were 45.61 degrees , 41.85 degrees , 53.46 degrees , and 42.95 degrees , respectively. Average neck version and angle of inclination were 9.73 degrees and 129.23 degrees , respectively. Differences existed between males and females and between those younger and older than 50 years. Correlations were observed between translation and concavity, and translation and the neck-shaft relationships.
Level II, prognostic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
在本研究中,我们对股骨近端的形态进行了全面描述。然后,利用这一框架,我们(1)确定了正常人群的均值、标准差和范围;(2)明确了亚组之间的差异;(3)展示了各种测量值之间的相关性。为实现这些目标,我们分析了375例成年股骨。标本在标准化位置进行数码拍照,使用ImageJ软件获取测量值。对头颈关系的三个参数进行了评估。通过四个原始偏移测量值(前、后、上、下)来检查平移,用于计算前后和上下比率。通过前后(AP)和外侧骨骺角来研究旋转。使用α、β、γ和δ角来检查凹陷。评估了颈干关系的两个参数,即颈干角和颈前倾角。平均前后比率和上下比率分别为1.14和0.90。平均AP角和外侧骨骺角分别为74.33度和81.83度。α、β、γ和δ角的平均值分别为45.61度、41.85度、53.46度和42.95度。平均颈干角和颈前倾角分别为9.73度和129.23度。男性与女性之间以及年龄小于50岁和大于50岁的人群之间存在差异。观察到平移与凹陷以及平移与颈干关系之间存在相关性。
II级,预后研究。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参阅作者指南。