Suppr超能文献

发育性髋关节异常中的股骨形态学:CT三维特征分析

Femoral Morphology in the Dysplastic Hip: Three-dimensional Characterizations With CT.

作者信息

Wells Joel, Nepple Jeffrey J, Crook Karla, Ross James R, Bedi Asheesh, Schoenecker Perry, Clohisy John C

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA.

UT Southwestern Orthopaedic Surgery, 1801 Inwood Road, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Apr;475(4):1045-1054. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5119-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hip dysplasia represents a spectrum of complex deformities on both sides of the joint. Although many studies have described the acetabular side of the deformity, to our knowledge, little is known about the three-dimensional (3-D) head and neck offset differences of the femora of dysplastic hips. A thorough knowledge of proximal femoral anatomy is important to prevent potential impingement and improve results after acetabular reorientation.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Are there common proximal femoral characteristics in patients with symptomatic hip dysplasia undergoing periacetabular osteotomy (PAO)? (2) Where is the location of maximal femoral head and neck offset deformity in hip dysplasia? (3) Do certain subgroups of dysplastic hips more commonly have cam-type femoral morphology? (4) Is there a relationship between hip ROM as well as impingement testing and 3-D head and neck offset deformity?

METHODS

Using our hip preservation database, 153 hips (148 patients) underwent PAO from October 2013 to July 2015. We identified 103 hips in 100 patients with acetabular dysplasia (lateral center-edge angle [LCEA] < 20°) and who had a Tönnis grade of 0 or 1. Eighty-six patients (86%) underwent preoperative low-dose pelvic CT scans at our institution as part of the preoperative planning for PAO. It is currently our standard to obtain preoperative low-dose pelvic CT scans (0.75-1.25 mSv, equivalent to three to five AP pelvis radiographs) on all patients before they undergo PAO unless a prior CT scan is performed at an outside institution. Hips with a history of a neuromuscular disorder, prior trauma, prior surgery, radiographic evidence of joint degeneration, ischemic necrosis, or Perthes-like deformities were excluded. Fifty hips in 50 patients met inclusion criteria and had CT scans available for review. Hips were analyzed with Dyonics Plan software and characterized with regard to version, neck-shaft angle, femoral head diameter, head and neck offset, femoral neck length, femoral offset, head center height, trochanteric height, and alpha angle. The maximum head and neck offset deformity was assessed using an entire clockface and an alpha angle ≥ 55° defined coexisting cam morphology. Subgroups included severity of lateral dysplasia: mild (LCEA 15°-20°) and moderate/severe (LCEA < 15°). Femoral version subgroups were defined as normal (5°-20°), decreased (≤ 5°), or increased (> 20°). The senior author (JCC) performed all physical examination testing.

RESULTS

The mean LCEA was 14° (±4°), whereas the mean femoral anteversion was 19° (±12°). Eight hips (16%) demonstrated relative femoral retroversion (≤ 5°), whereas 26 (52%) showed excessive femoral anteversion (> 20°). Four hips (8%) had ≥ 35° of femoral anteversion. The mean neck-shaft angle was 136° (±5°). The mean maximum alpha location was 2:00 o'clock (±45 minutes) and the mean maximum alpha angle was 52° (±6°). Minimum head-neck offset ratio was located at 1:30 with a mean of 0.14 (±0.03). An anterior head-neck offset ratio of ≤ 0.17 or an alpha angle ≥ 55° was found in 43 (86%) of hips. Twenty-one dysplastic hips (42%) had an alpha angle ≥ 55°. Mildly dysplastic hips had decreased femoral head and neck offset (9 ± 1) and head and neck offset ratio (0.20 ± 0.03) at 12 o'clock compared with moderate/severe dysplastic hips (10 ± 1 and 0.22 ± 0.03, respectively; p = 0.04 and p = 0.01). With the numbers available, we found that hips with excessive femoral anteversion (> 20°) had no difference in the alpha angle at 3 o'clock (42 ± 7) compared with hips with relative femoral retroversion (≤ 5°; 48 ± 4; p = 0.06). No other differences in femoral morphology were found between hips with mild or moderate/severe dysplasia or in the femoral version subgroups with the numbers available. Anterior impingement test was positive in 76% of hips with an alpha angle ≥ 55° and 83% of the hips with an alpha angle ≤ 55°. No correlation was found between proximal femoral morphology and preoperative ROM.

CONCLUSIONS

In this subset of dysplastic hips, cam deformity of the femoral head and neck was present in 42% of hips with maximal head-neck deformity at 2 o'clock, and 82% had reduced head-neck offset at the 1:30 point. We conclude that cam-type deformities and decreased head-neck offset in developmental dysplasia of the hip are common. Patients should be closely assessed for need of a head and neck osteochondroplasty, especially after acetabular correction. Future prospective studies should evaluate the influence of proximal femoral anatomy on surgical results of PAO for dysplastic hips.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, prognostic study.

摘要

背景

髋关节发育不良表现为关节两侧一系列复杂的畸形。尽管许多研究描述了畸形的髋臼侧,但据我们所知,对于发育不良髋关节股骨的三维(3-D)头颈部偏移差异了解甚少。深入了解股骨近端解剖结构对于预防潜在的撞击并改善髋臼重新定位后的结果很重要。

问题/目的:(1)接受髋臼周围截骨术(PAO)的有症状髋关节发育不良患者是否存在常见的股骨近端特征?(2)髋关节发育不良时股骨头和颈最大偏移畸形位于何处?(3)某些发育不良髋关节亚组是否更常具有凸轮型股骨形态?(4)髋关节活动度以及撞击试验与三维头颈部偏移畸形之间是否存在关联?

方法

利用我们的髋关节保留数据库,2013年10月至2015年7月期间对153例髋关节(148例患者)进行了PAO。我们在100例髋臼发育不良(外侧中心边缘角[LCEA]<20°)且Tönnis分级为0或1的患者中确定了103例髋关节。86例患者(86%)在我们机构接受了术前低剂量骨盆CT扫描,作为PAO术前规划的一部分。目前我们的标准是,除非患者之前在外部机构进行过CT扫描,否则所有接受PAO的患者在术前都要进行低剂量骨盆CT扫描(0.75 - 1.25 mSv,相当于三到五张前后位骨盆X线片)。排除有神经肌肉疾病史、既往创伤史、既往手术史、关节退变影像学证据、缺血性坏死或佩特兹样畸形的髋关节。50例患者的50例髋关节符合纳入标准且有CT扫描可供复查。使用Dyonics Plan软件对髋关节进行分析,并根据旋转角度、颈干角、股骨头直径、头颈部偏移、股骨颈长度、股骨偏移、股骨头中心高度、大转子高度和α角进行特征描述。使用整个钟面评估最大头颈部偏移畸形,并将α角≥55°定义为并存凸轮形态。亚组包括外侧发育不良的严重程度:轻度(LCEA 15° - 20°)和中度/重度(LCEA<15°)。股骨旋转角度亚组定义为正常(5° - 20°)、减小(≤5°)或增加(>20°)。资深作者(JCC)进行所有体格检查测试。

结果

平均LCEA为14°(±4°),而平均股骨前倾角为(19°±12°))。8例髋关节(16%)表现为相对股骨后倾(≤5°),而26例(52%)表现为股骨前倾角过大(>20°)。4例髋关节(8%)股骨前倾角≥35°。平均颈干角为136°(±5°)。平均最大α角位置为2:00(±45分钟),平均最大α角为52°(±6°)。最小头颈部偏移比值位于1:30,平均值为0.14(±0.03)。43例(86%)髋关节的前侧头颈部偏移比值≤0.17或α角≥55°。21例发育不良髋关节(42%)的α角≥55°。与中度/重度发育不良髋关节相比(分别为10±1和0.2 ±0.03,p = 0.04和p = 0.01),轻度发育不良髋关节在12点位置的股骨头和颈偏移(9±1)以及头颈部偏移比值(0.20±0.03)减小。就现有数据而言,我们发现股骨前倾角过大(>20°)的髋关节与相对股骨后倾(≤5°)的髋关节在3点位置的α角(42±7)无差异(48±4;p = 0.06)。在轻度或中度/重度发育不良的髋关节之间或现有数据的股骨旋转角度亚组之间,未发现股骨形态的其他差异。α角≥55°的髋关节中76%的前侧撞击试验为阳性,α角≤55°的髋关节中83%的前侧撞击试验为阳性。未发现股骨近端形态与术前活动度之间存在相关性。

结论

在这组发育不良髋关节中,42%的髋关节存在股骨头和颈的凸轮畸形,最大头颈部畸形位于2点位置,82%的髋关节在1:30位置头颈部偏移减小。我们得出结论,髋关节发育性发育不良中的凸轮型畸形和头颈部偏移减小很常见。应密切评估患者是否需要进行头颈部骨软骨成形术,尤其是在髋臼矫正后。未来的前瞻性研究应评估股骨近端解剖结构对发育不良髋关节PAO手术结果的影响。

证据水平

IV级,预后研究。

相似文献

1
Femoral Morphology in the Dysplastic Hip: Three-dimensional Characterizations With CT.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Apr;475(4):1045-1054. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5119-2.
2
Three Patterns of Acetabular Deficiency Are Common in Young Adult Patients With Acetabular Dysplasia.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Apr;475(4):1037-1044. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5150-3.
3
What Are the Results of Surgical Treatment of Hip Dysplasia With Concomitant Cam Deformity?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Apr;475(4):1128-1137. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5054-2.
4
Medialization of the Hip's Center with Periacetabular Osteotomy: Validation of Assessment with Plain Radiographs.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 May 1;479(5):1040-1049. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001572.
5
Periacetabular osteotomy restores the typically excessive range of motion in dysplastic hips with a spherical head.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Apr;473(4):1404-16. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-4089-5.
6
Do Radiographic Parameters of Dysplasia Improve to Normal Ranges After Bernese Periacetabular Osteotomy?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Apr;475(4):1120-1127. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5077-8.
8
What Are the Early Outcomes of True Reverse Periacetabular Osteotomy for Symptomatic Hip Overcoverage?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 May 1;479(5):1081-1093. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001549.
9
Can the Femoro-Epiphyseal Acetabular Roof (FEAR) Index Be Used to Distinguish Dysplasia from Impingement?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 May 1;479(5):962-971. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001610.

引用本文的文献

3
AI-Assisted 3D Planning of CT Parameters for Personalized Femoral Prosthesis Selection in Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2025 Jun 18;21:905-916. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S521755. eCollection 2025.
5
Identifying Risk Factors for Disease Progression in Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip Using a Contralateral Hip Model.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2024 Dec 18;106(24):2322-2329. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.24.00308. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
7
Femurs in patients with hip dysplasia have fundamental shape differences compared with cam femoroacetabular impingement.
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2024 Feb 5;11(2):132-139. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnae004. eCollection 2024 Jul.
10
Development of a simulation system for femoroacetabular impingement detection based on 3D images.
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2023 Nov 11;11(1):20-29. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnad037. eCollection 2024 Jan.

本文引用的文献

1
Survivorship of the Bernese Periacetabular Osteotomy: What Factors are Associated with Long-term Failure?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Feb;475(2):396-405. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4887-z. Epub 2016 May 12.
2
Femoral Morphology in Patients Undergoing Periacetabular Osteotomy for Classic or Borderline Acetabular Dysplasia: Are Cam Deformities Common?
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Sep;31(9 Suppl):259-63. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.01.066. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
3
High prevalence of cam deformity in dysplastic hips: A three-dimensional CT study.
J Orthop Res. 2016 Sep;34(9):1613-9. doi: 10.1002/jor.23147. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
5
The femoral neck-shaft angle on plain radiographs: a systematic review.
Skeletal Radiol. 2016 Jan;45(1):19-28. doi: 10.1007/s00256-015-2236-z. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
8
How are dysplastic hips different? A three-dimensional CT study.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 May;473(5):1712-23. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-4103-y. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
9
Characterization of symptomatic hip impingement in butterfly ice hockey goalies.
Arthroscopy. 2015 Apr;31(4):635-42. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.10.010. Epub 2014 Dec 10.
10
Are normal hips being labeled as pathologic? A CT-based method for defining normal acetabular coverage.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Apr;473(4):1247-54. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-4055-2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验