Megele R
Neurochirurgische Abteilung, Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder, Regensburg.
Nervenarzt. 1991 Jun;62(6):354-9.
In a first series 100 patients underwent surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) after being tested by provocative tests for sensory disturbances preoperatively. In addition to the well-established tests like passive wrist flexion (Phalen's test) or wrist extension, active movement tests of the patient against resistance were investigated. Tests of active movement were introduced because of the high values of intraoperatively measured pressure at the median nerve, similar to those recorded with passive movements. All investigated provocative tests for sensory disturbances related to CTS, investigated by active and passive movements, were positive in 72% to 84% of patients. Average delay times for reaction of these provocative tests ranged between 15.7 and 19.5 s. Furthermore Tinel's sign showed a sensitivity of 64% and the flick sign one of 69%. The specificity of tests and signs for the CTS was assessed on a group of 50 surgically treated patients with cervical nerve root entrapment at the C5-C8 level. In this group and a second CTS group the most sensitive of each test in the first series (active and passive provocational movement), Tinel's sign and flick sign were investigated. By forming subgroups in both diseases we showed that the results of the total groups were not influenced by a possible double crush. We could demonstrate high sensitivities in cervical nerve root entrapment for Phalen's sign with 74% and for active thumb abduction with 68% and a medium sensitivity for Tinel's sign with 40%--thus implying low specificity for CTS. Only the flick sign turned out to be relatively specific for CTS--its sensitivity in cervical nerve root entrapment was around 26%--indicating its potential to function as a valid criterion for the differential diagnosis of CTS and cervical nerve root entrapment syndrome.
在第一个系列研究中,100例患者在术前接受了感觉障碍激发试验检测后,接受了腕管综合征(CTS)的手术治疗。除了如被动屈腕(Phalen试验)或伸腕等已确立的试验外,还研究了患者主动抗阻运动试验。引入主动运动试验是因为术中测量的正中神经压力值较高,与被动运动时记录的值相似。通过主动和被动运动研究的所有与CTS相关的感觉障碍激发试验,在72%至84%的患者中呈阳性。这些激发试验的平均反应延迟时间在15.7至19.5秒之间。此外,Tinel征的敏感性为64%,弹拨征的敏感性为69%。在一组50例接受手术治疗的C5 - C8水平颈神经根卡压患者中评估了CTS检测和体征的特异性。在该组和第二个CTS组中,研究了第一个系列中每项试验(主动和被动激发运动)、Tinel征和弹拨征中最敏感的指标。通过在两种疾病中形成亚组,我们表明总体组的结果不受可能的双重卡压的影响。我们可以证明,在颈神经根卡压中,Phalen征的敏感性为74%,主动拇指外展的敏感性为68%,Tinel征的敏感性为中等水平,为40%——因此意味着对CTS的特异性较低。只有弹拨征对CTS表现出相对特异性——其在颈神经根卡压中的敏感性约为26%——表明其有潜力作为CTS和颈神经根卡压综合征鉴别诊断的有效标准。