Clohisy John C, Kamath Ganesh V, Byrd Gregory D, Steger-May Karen, Wright Rick W
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Barnes-Jewish Hospital at Washington University School of Medicine, One Barnes-Hospital Plaza, Suite 11300 West Pavilion, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Sep;90(9):1848-54. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00856.
Periodic clinical and radiographic evaluation is commonly recommended by orthopaedic surgeons to monitor patients following total joint arthroplasty, yet the compliance with and efficacy of patient follow-up protocols have not been well defined. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient compliance with early clinical follow-up after total hip arthroplasty or total knee arthroplasty.
We performed a retrospective review of clinical follow-up compliance for 776 patients who had undergone a total joint arthroplasty in the lower extremity. This cohort included 505 total hip arthroplasties (372 primary and 133 revision procedures) and 271 total knee arthroplasties (195 primary and seventy-six revision procedures). The patients were given one-time verbal instructions by the treating surgeon at the three-month postoperative visit to return for the one-year follow-up evaluation. At the one-year follow-up evaluation, those who returned were once again verbally instructed to return a year later. Demographic factors, functional hip and knee scores, and follow-up compliance at one and two years after surgery were assessed.
Patient compliance with clinical follow-up after all arthroplasties was 61% at one year and 36% at two years. With use of a multivariate model for patients who had total hip arthroplasty, the analyses showed that a revision hip procedure (p = 0.006), younger patient age (p = 0.04), and a higher preoperative Harris hip score for gait (p = 0.04) were associated with follow-up compliance at two years. Of the factors analyzed for patients who had total knee arthroplasty, only nonwhite race (p = 0.03) was found to be a positive predictor of follow-up compliance at the two-year follow-up interval.
Patient compliance with clinical follow-up after total joint arthroplasty in response to a verbal request made by the surgeon once at three months and once at one year postoperatively was poor in this series. These data indicate that this method (one-time verbal instruction) is insufficient to ensure compliance for follow-up after total joint arthroplasty.
骨科医生通常建议对全关节置换术后的患者进行定期临床和影像学评估,然而患者随访方案的依从性和有效性尚未得到明确界定。本研究的目的是评估全髋关节置换术或全膝关节置换术后患者对早期临床随访的依从性。
我们对776例接受下肢全关节置换术的患者的临床随访依从性进行了回顾性分析。该队列包括505例全髋关节置换术(372例初次手术和133例翻修手术)和271例全膝关节置换术(195例初次手术和76例翻修手术)。在术后三个月的随访中,主刀医生对患者进行了一次性口头指示,要求他们回来进行一年后的随访评估。在一年后的随访评估中,对回来的患者再次进行口头指示,要求他们一年后再来。评估了人口统计学因素、髋关节和膝关节功能评分以及术后一年和两年的随访依从性。
所有关节置换术后患者的临床随访依从性在一年时为61%,在两年时为36%。对于接受全髋关节置换术的患者,使用多变量模型分析显示,翻修髋关节手术(p = 0.006)、患者年龄较轻(p = 0.04)以及术前步态的Harris髋关节评分较高(p = 0.04)与两年后的随访依从性相关。在对接受全膝关节置换术的患者分析的因素中,仅发现非白人种族(p = 0.03)是两年随访期内随访依从性的积极预测因素。
在本系列研究中,患者对全关节置换术后应外科医生术后三个月和一年各一次口头要求进行临床随访的依从性较差。这些数据表明,这种方法(一次性口头指示)不足以确保全关节置换术后随访的依从性。