Bondy Susan J, Johnson Ian, Cole Donald C, Bercovitz Kim
Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
Can J Public Health. 2008 Jul-Aug;99(4):246-51. doi: 10.1007/BF03403748.
Public health authorities have prioritized the identification of competencies, yet little empirical data exist to support decisions on competency selection among particular disciplines. We sought perspectives on important competencies among epidemiologists familiar with or practicing in public health settings (local to national).
Using a sequential, qualitative-quantitative mixed method design, we conducted key informant interviews with 12 public health practitioners familiar with front-line epidemiologists' practice, followed by a web-based survey of members of a provincial association of public health epidemiologists (90 respondents of 155 eligible) and a consensus workshop. Competency statements were drawn from existing core competency lists and those identified by key informants, and ranked by extent of agreement in importance for entry-level practitioners.
Competencies in quantitative methods and analysis, critical appraisal of scientific evidence and knowledge transfer of scientific data to other members of the public health team were all regarded as very important for public health epidemiologists. Epidemiologist competencies focused on the provision, interpretation and 'translation' of evidence to inform decision-making by other public health professionals. Considerable tension existed around some potential competency items, particularly in the areas of more advanced database and data-analytic skills.
Empirical data can inform discussions of discipline-specific competencies as one input to decisions about competencies appropriate for epidemiologists in the public health workforce.
公共卫生当局已将能力识别列为优先事项,但几乎没有实证数据可支持在特定学科中进行能力选择的决策。我们寻求熟悉公共卫生环境(从地方到国家)或在其中执业的流行病学家对重要能力的看法。
采用定性-定量混合的顺序设计方法,我们对12名熟悉一线流行病学家实践的公共卫生从业者进行了关键信息访谈,随后对一个省级公共卫生流行病学家协会的成员进行了基于网络的调查(155名合格者中有90名受访者),并举办了一次共识研讨会。能力陈述取自现有的核心能力清单和关键信息提供者确定的清单,并根据对入门级从业者重要性的认同程度进行排名。
定量方法与分析、对科学证据的批判性评估以及将科学数据向公共卫生团队其他成员进行知识转移等能力,对公共卫生流行病学家而言都被视为非常重要。流行病学家的能力集中在提供、解释和“转化”证据,以为其他公共卫生专业人员的决策提供依据。在一些潜在的能力项目上存在相当大的争议,特别是在更高级的数据库和数据分析技能领域。
实证数据可为关于特定学科能力的讨论提供信息,作为确定适合公共卫生工作队伍中流行病学家的能力决策的一项输入。