Suppr超能文献

制定标准化的头影测量术语:选择与可能的策略。

Developing a standardized cephalometric vocabulary: choices and possible strategies.

作者信息

Stewart Randall F, Edgar Heather, Tatlock Charles, Kroth Philip J

机构信息

Health Sciences Library and Informatics Center, MSC09 5100, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001, USA.

出版信息

J Dent Educ. 2008 Sep;72(9):989-97.

Abstract

The science of cephalometry has been invaluable for guiding orthodontic diagnosis, treatment planning, and outcomes tracking. Though software packages easily calculate most cephalometric measurements, the ability to exchange cephalometric data between software packages is poorly developed. Hindering this effort is the lack of an agreed-upon standard for electronic exchange of cephalometric measurements. Unlike more technological issues, the problem of creating such a standard is one of formalizing decisions already established through historical precedent. Solving this problem will require education, cooperation, and consensus in order to reap the potential improvements to patient care, dental education, and research. The first step in overcoming these remaining issues is awareness. This article reviews those factors that place cephalometric measurements in an excellent position for standardization, outlines those decisions that must be made in order to realize the goal of electronic exchange of cephalometric information, and describes some of the options for these decisions as well as some advantages and disadvantages of each.

摘要

头影测量学对于指导正畸诊断、治疗计划制定和治疗效果追踪一直具有重要价值。尽管软件包能够轻松计算大多数头影测量值,但软件包之间交换头影测量数据的能力却很不完善。阻碍这一工作的是缺乏一个关于头影测量值电子交换的公认标准。与更多技术问题不同,创建这样一个标准的问题在于将已通过历史先例确立的决策形式化。解决这个问题需要教育、合作与共识,以便在患者护理、牙科教育和研究方面取得潜在的改进。克服这些遗留问题的第一步是提高认识。本文回顾了那些使头影测量值处于标准化有利地位的因素,概述了为实现头影测量信息电子交换目标必须做出的决策,并描述了这些决策的一些选项以及每个选项的一些优缺点。

相似文献

2
Solving incompatibilities between electronic records for orthodontic patients.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Jul;132(1):116-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.07.024.
4
A benchmark for comparison of dental radiography analysis algorithms.
Med Image Anal. 2016 Jul;31:63-76. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2016.02.004. Epub 2016 Feb 28.
5
AI-based open-source software for cephalometric analysis from limited FOV radiographs.
J Dent. 2024 Dec;151:105412. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105412. Epub 2024 Oct 20.
6
Quality assessment of orthodontic radiography in children.
Eur J Orthod. 2016 Feb;38(1):96-102. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjv033. Epub 2015 May 14.
7
ADA initiates development of orthodontic informatics standards.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Aug;128(2):153-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.04.017.
8
Comparison of cephalometric measurements from three radiological clinics.
Braz Oral Res. 2006 Apr-Jun;20(2):162-6. doi: 10.1590/s1806-83242006000200013.

引用本文的文献

1
Fully automated landmarking and facial segmentation on 3D photographs.
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 18;14(1):6463. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56956-9.
2
Using LOINC to link 10 terminology standards to one unified standard in a specialized domain.
J Biomed Inform. 2012 Aug;45(4):674-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2011.10.003. Epub 2011 Oct 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Cephalometry.
J Craniofac Surg. 2007 Jul;18(4):811-7. doi: 10.1097/scs.0b013e31806848cf.
2
Solving incompatibilities between electronic records for orthodontic patients.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Jul;132(1):116-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.07.024.
3
Validity and reliability of a new edge-based computerized method for identification of cephalometric landmarks.
Angle Orthod. 2006 Jul;76(4):619-24. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0619:VAROAN]2.0.CO;2.
4
ADA initiates development of orthodontic informatics standards.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Aug;128(2):153-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.04.017.
5
Why integration is key for dental office technology.
J Am Dent Assoc. 2004 Oct;135 Suppl:4S-9S. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2004.0413.
6
Grand challenges in dental informatics.
Adv Dent Res. 2003 Dec;17:16-9. doi: 10.1177/154407370301700105.
7
8
Guideline and quality indicators for development, purchase and use of controlled health vocabularies.
Int J Med Inform. 2002 Dec 18;68(1-3):175-86. doi: 10.1016/s1386-5056(02)00075-8.
10
Clinical terminology: why is it so hard?
Methods Inf Med. 1999 Dec;38(4-5):239-52.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验