Ruth Betty J, Sisco Sarah, Wyatt Jamie, Bethke Christina, Bachman Sara S, Piper Tinka Markham
Boston University School of Social Work, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Public Health Rep. 2008;123 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):71-7. doi: 10.1177/00333549081230S210.
The emergence of new, complex social health concerns demands that the public health field strengthen its capacity to respond. Academic institutions are vital to improving the public health infrastructure. Collaborative and transdisciplinary practice competencies are increasingly viewed as key components of public health training. The social work profession, with its longstanding involvement in public health and emphasis on ecological approaches, has been a partner in many transdisciplinary community-based efforts. The more than 20 dual-degree programs in public health and social work currently offered reflect this collaborative history. This study represents an exploratory effort to evaluate the impact of these programs on the fields of public health and social work.
This study explored motivations, perspectives, and experiences of 41 graduates from four master of social work/master of public health (MSW/ MPH) programs. Four focus groups were conducted using traditional qualitative methods during 2004.
Findings suggest that MSW/MPH alumni self-selected into dual programs because of their interest in the missions, ethics, and practices of both professions. Participants highlighted the challenges and opportunities of dual professionalism, including the struggle to better define public health social work in the workplace.
Implications for academic public health focus on how schools can improve MSW/MPH programs to promote transdisciplinary collaboration. Increased recognition, better coordination, and greater emphasis on marketing to prospective employers were suggested. A national evaluation of MSW/MPH graduates could strengthen the roles and contributions of public health social work to the public health infrastructure. A conceptual framework, potentially based on developmental theory, could guide this evaluation of the MSW/MPH training experience.
新出现的、复杂的社会健康问题要求公共卫生领域加强应对能力。学术机构对于改善公共卫生基础设施至关重要。协作和跨学科实践能力日益被视为公共卫生培训的关键组成部分。社会工作专业长期以来一直参与公共卫生工作并强调生态方法,在许多基于社区的跨学科努力中一直是合作伙伴。目前提供的20多个公共卫生与社会工作双学位项目反映了这段合作历史。本研究旨在探索性评估这些项目对公共卫生和社会工作领域的影响。
本研究探讨了来自四个社会工作硕士/公共卫生硕士(MSW/MPH)项目的41名毕业生的动机、观点和经历。2004年期间,采用传统定性方法进行了四个焦点小组访谈。
研究结果表明,MSW/MPH校友因对两个专业的使命、伦理和实践感兴趣而自行选择了双学位项目。参与者强调了双重专业身份带来的挑战和机遇,包括在工作场所努力更好地界定公共卫生社会工作。
对学术性公共卫生的启示集中在学校如何改进MSW/MPH项目以促进跨学科合作。建议提高认可度、加强协调,并更加强调向潜在雇主进行宣传。对MSW/MPH毕业生进行全国性评估可以加强公共卫生社会工作在公共卫生基础设施中的作用和贡献。一个可能基于发展理论的概念框架可以指导对MSW/MPH培训经历的评估。