Suppr超能文献

使用活检枪进行数字引导经直肠活检与经直肠针吸活检的比较:诊断率与舒适度对比

Digitally-directed transrectal biopsy using Biopty gun versus transrectal needle aspiration: comparison of diagnostic yield and comfort.

作者信息

Renfer L G, Kiesling V J, Kelley J, Vaccaro J A, Belville W D

机构信息

Department of Surgery (Urology Service), Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, Washington.

出版信息

Urology. 1991 Aug;38(2):108-12. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(05)80068-8.

Abstract

A technique for digitally-directed core biopsy using the Biopty device and prospective comparison of accuracy and comfort, using this technique simultaneously with transrectal needle aspiration, are presented. To better estimate the true prevalence of carcinoma in the study population, a repeat combined procedure was performed on all subjects who did not have carcinoma confirmed on the initial core biopsies. All procedures were done by one investigator and all pathology reviewed by one senior pathologist. A total of 180 combined procedures were performed on 100 consecutive patients with palpably abnormal prostates; 30 carcinomas were detected. Digitally-directed Biopty biopsy yielded a sensitivity rate of 87 percent compared with 57 percent for needle aspiration (p less than 0.05). Using a numerical comfort scale, the Biopty device was also rated less painful than needle aspiration (p = 0.0001). The morbidity of the combined procedure was minimal, with a minor complication rate of 2.2 percent. No infections occurred.

摘要

本文介绍了一种使用Biopty设备进行数字引导下的芯针活检技术,并前瞻性地比较了该技术与经直肠针吸活检同时使用时的准确性和舒适度。为了更好地估计研究人群中癌症的真实患病率,对所有在初次芯针活检中未确诊为癌症的受试者进行了重复联合检查。所有操作均由一名研究人员完成,所有病理检查均由一名资深病理学家进行。对100例前列腺可触及异常的连续患者共进行了180次联合检查,检测出30例癌症。数字引导下的Biopty活检敏感性率为87%,而针吸活检为57%(p<0.05)。使用数字舒适度量表,Biopty设备的疼痛程度也低于针吸活检(p=0.0001)。联合检查的发病率极低,轻微并发症发生率为2.2%。未发生感染。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验