Norman J Farley, Norman Hideko F, Craft Amy E, Walton Crystal L, Bartholomew Ashley N, Burton Cory L, Wiesemann Elizabeth Y, Crabtree Charles E
Department of Psychology, 1906 College Heights Boulevard #21030, Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY 42101-1030, USA.
Vision Res. 2008 Oct;48(23-24):2456-65. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.08.008. Epub 2008 Sep 17.
Three experiments investigated whether and to what extent increases in age affect the functionality of stereopsis. The observers' ages ranged from 18 to 83 years. The overall goal was to challenge the older stereoscopic visual system by utilizing high magnitudes of binocular disparity, ambiguous binocular disparity [cf., Julesz, B., & Chang, J. (1976). Interaction between pools of binocular disparity detectors tuned to different disparities. Biological Cybernetics, 22, 107-119], and by making binocular matching more difficult. In particular, Experiment 1 evaluated observers' abilities to discriminate ordinal depth differences away from the horopter using standing disparities of 6.5-46 min arc. Experiment 2 assessed observers' abilities to discriminate stereoscopic shape using line-element stereograms. The direction (crossed vs. uncrossed) and magnitude of the binocular disparity (13.7 and 51.5 min arc) were manipulated. Binocular matching was made more difficult by varying the orientations of corresponding line elements across the two eyes' views. The purpose of Experiment 3 was to determine whether the aging stereoscopic system can resolve ambiguous binocular disparities in a manner similar to that of younger observers. The results of all experiments demonstrated that older observers' stereoscopic vision is functionally comparable to that of younger observers in many respects. For example, both age groups exhibited a similar ability to discriminate depth and surface shape. The results also showed, however, that age-related differences in stereopsis do exist, and they become most noticeable when the older stereoscopic system is challenged by multiple simultaneous factors.
三项实验研究了年龄增长是否以及在何种程度上会影响立体视觉的功能。观察者的年龄范围为18岁至83岁。总体目标是通过利用高幅度的双眼视差、模糊的双眼视差[参见,朱尔兹,B.,& 张,J.(1976年)。调谐到不同视差的双眼视差探测器池之间的相互作用。生物控制论,22,107 - 119],以及通过使双眼匹配更加困难,来挑战老年立体视觉系统。具体而言,实验1评估了观察者使用6.5 - 46分弧度的静态视差来辨别离水平视野的顺序深度差异的能力。实验2评估了观察者使用线元立体图来辨别立体形状的能力。操纵了双眼视差的方向(交叉与非交叉)和幅度(13.7和51.5分弧度)。通过改变两眼视图中相应线元的方向,使双眼匹配更加困难。实验3的目的是确定老化的立体视觉系统是否能够以与年轻观察者类似的方式解决模糊的双眼视差。所有实验的结果表明,老年观察者的立体视觉在许多方面在功能上与年轻观察者相当。例如,两个年龄组在辨别深度和表面形状方面表现出相似的能力。然而,结果还表明,立体视觉中与年龄相关的差异确实存在,并且当老年立体视觉系统受到多个同时存在的因素挑战时,这些差异变得最为明显。