Cox Charles L, Kuhn John E
Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232-8828, USA.
Curr Sports Med Rep. 2008 Sep-Oct;7(5):263-8. doi: 10.1249/JSR.0b013e318186d26d.
The purpose of this manuscript is to review evaluation and treatment techniques in patients with glenohumeral instability with specific attention to treatment of anterior shoulder dislocation. Scrutiny of the best available evidence reveals that: 1) there is little quality evidence to advocate one reduction technique over another, 2) premedication with intra-articular lidocaine is preferred over intravenous narcotics and benzodiazepine, 3) recurrence rates are age related and may be associated with higher energy injuries, but other predictors of recurrence are not clear, 4) post-reduction immobilization in internal rotation does not affect recurrence, 5) post-reduction immobilization in external rotation appears to decrease recurrence, 6) arthroscopic or open repair decreases recurrence compared with nonoperative treatment, 7) recurrence after arthroscopic repair using transglenoid sutures or staples is higher compared with open repair, 8) recurrence after arthroscopic repair with suture anchors is comparable with open repair in treatment of isolated Bankart lesions, and 9) further research is needed to clarify risk factors that predict recurrence in order to assist the clinician in deciding upon operative versus nonoperative treatment.
本手稿的目的是回顾盂肱关节不稳患者的评估和治疗技术,特别关注前肩关节脱位的治疗。对现有最佳证据的仔细审查表明:1)几乎没有高质量证据支持一种复位技术优于另一种,2)关节内利多卡因预处理优于静脉注射麻醉剂和苯二氮䓬,3)复发率与年龄相关,可能与更高能量损伤有关,但其他复发预测因素尚不清楚,4)复位后内旋固定不影响复发,5)复位后外旋固定似乎可降低复发率,6)与非手术治疗相比,关节镜或开放修复可降低复发率,7)使用经关节缝线或吻合钉的关节镜修复后复发率高于开放修复,8)在孤立性Bankart损伤的治疗中,使用缝线锚钉的关节镜修复后复发率与开放修复相当,9)需要进一步研究以阐明预测复发的危险因素,以帮助临床医生决定手术治疗还是非手术治疗。