• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初次保守治疗后,不稳定性严重指数评分不能预测肩脱位风险。

Instability Severity Index Score Does Not Predict the Risk of Shoulder Dislocation after a First Episode Treated Conservatively.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University, 00128 Rome, Italy.

1st Orthopedic Division, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 16;18(22):12026. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182212026.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph182212026
PMID:34831778
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8623142/
Abstract

The first purpose of this study was to verify the association between Instability Severity Index Score (ISIS) and Recurrent Shoulder Dislocation (RSD) after a first episode treated conservatively. The second aim is to identify the risk factors associated with RSD after a primary acute shoulder anterior dislocation treated conservatively. A total of 111 patients with first traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation treated at a single trauma centre between January 2014 and March 2016 were enrolled. The main predictive variables of risk factors and the ISIS score were calculated. Among the 85 patients included, 26 cases of RSD were observed (30.6%). Considering the whole population, no significant association between ISIS and RSD were reported. Regarding other risk factors, high-risk working activities and rotator cuff injury had a significantly higher RSD risk. Sex, dominant limb, familiar history, hyperlaxity, contact or overhead sports, competitive sport, post-reduction physiokinesitherapy, return to sports activity time, Hill-Sachs lesion, bony Bankart lesion and great tuberosity fracture did not seem to influence the risk of RSD. No correlation between ISIS score and RSD in patients treated conservatively after a first episode of shoulder dislocation were reported. The only risk factors with a significant association to RSD were high-risk working activities and rotator cuff injury.

摘要

本研究的首要目的是验证初次保守治疗后不稳定严重程度指数评分(ISIS)与复发性肩关节脱位(RSD)之间的关联。第二个目的是确定初次急性肩关节前脱位经保守治疗后与 RSD 相关的危险因素。共纳入 2014 年 1 月至 2016 年 3 月在一家创伤中心接受初次创伤性前肩脱位治疗的 111 例患者。计算了主要预测变量和 ISIS 评分的危险因素。在纳入的 85 例患者中,观察到 26 例 RSD(30.6%)。考虑到整个人群,ISIS 与 RSD 之间无显著相关性。对于其他危险因素,高风险工作活动和肩袖损伤的 RSD 风险显著增加。性别、优势肢体、家族史、过度松弛、接触性或过头运动、竞技运动、复位后物理治疗、重返运动时间、Hill-Sachs 损伤、骨 Bankart 损伤和大结节骨折似乎并不影响 RSD 的风险。未报告初次肩部脱位后保守治疗患者的 ISIS 评分与 RSD 之间存在相关性。与 RSD 显著相关的唯一危险因素是高风险工作活动和肩袖损伤。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88a7/8623142/89428976c887/ijerph-18-12026-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88a7/8623142/89428976c887/ijerph-18-12026-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88a7/8623142/89428976c887/ijerph-18-12026-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Instability Severity Index Score Does Not Predict the Risk of Shoulder Dislocation after a First Episode Treated Conservatively.初次保守治疗后,不稳定性严重指数评分不能预测肩脱位风险。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 16;18(22):12026. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182212026.
2
Age, participation in competitive sports, bony lesions, ALPSA lesions, > 1 preoperative dislocations, surgical delay and ISIS score > 3 are risk factors for recurrence following arthroscopic Bankart repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 4584 shoulders.年龄、参与竞技体育、骨损伤、ALPSA 损伤、术前脱位次数>1、手术延迟和 ISIS 评分>3 是关节镜下 Bankart 修复术后复发的危险因素:4584 例肩关节的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Dec;29(12):4004-4014. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06704-7. Epub 2021 Aug 22.
3
[Treatment strategy in first traumatic anterior dislocation of the shoulder. Plea for a multi-stage concept of preventive initial management].[首次创伤性肩关节前脱位的治疗策略。呼吁采用多阶段预防性初始处理概念]
Unfallchirurg. 1998 May;101(5):328-41; discussion 327. doi: 10.1007/s001130050278.
4
Limited Predictive Value of the Instability Severity Index Score: Evaluation of 217 Consecutive Cases of Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability.不稳定严重程度指数评分的预测价值有限:217 例复发性前肩不稳定连续病例的评估。
Arthroscopy. 2021 May;37(5):1381-1391. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.12.185. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
5
Instability severity index score values below 7 do not predict recurrence after arthroscopic Bankart repair.不稳定严重指数评分值低于 7 并不预测关节镜下 Bankart 修复后的复发。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Dec;27(12):3905-3911. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05471-w. Epub 2019 Apr 6.
6
Long-term results of arthroscopic Bankart repairs for anterior instability of the shoulder in patients aged thirty years or older.30 岁或以上患者肩关节前向不稳定的关节镜 Bankart 修复的长期结果。
Int Orthop. 2021 Jun;45(6):1583-1589. doi: 10.1007/s00264-021-05014-4. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
7
Utility of the Instability Severity Index Score in Predicting Failure After Arthroscopic Anterior Stabilization of the Shoulder.不稳定严重程度指数评分在预测肩关节镜下前路稳定术后失败中的效用
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Aug;43(8):1983-8. doi: 10.1177/0363546515587083. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
8
COMPARATIVE STUDY on the MANAGEMENT of GLENOHUMERAL JOINT DISLOCATION. Closed Reduction vs. Arthroscopic Remplissage with Bankart Lesion Repair.肩肱关节脱位治疗的比较研究。闭合复位与关节镜下Bankart损伤修复的 remplissage 术对比
J Med Liban. 2016 Jul-Sep;64(3):175-80. doi: 10.12816/0031528.
9
Editorial Commentary: Recurrence After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair: What the Instability Severity Index Score Will and Will Not Predict.社论评论:关节镜下 Bankart 修复术后的复发:不稳严重指数评分能预测什么,不能预测什么。
Arthroscopy. 2021 May;37(5):1397-1399. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.02.005.
10
Arthroscopic Soft Tissue Stabilization With Selective Augmentations for Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Instability in Competitive Collision Athletes.关节镜下选择性增强软组织稳定术治疗竞技性碰撞运动员创伤性前肩不稳定。
Am J Sports Med. 2021 May;49(6):1604-1611. doi: 10.1177/03635465211003091. Epub 2021 Apr 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Is Revision Arthroscopic Bankart Repair a Viable Option? A Systematic Review of Recurrent Instability following Bankart Repair.关节镜下Bankart修复翻修术是一个可行的选择吗?Bankart修复术后复发性不稳定的系统评价。
J Clin Med. 2024 May 23;13(11):3067. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113067.
2
Risk Factors Associated with First Time and Recurrent Shoulder Instability: A Systematic Review.首次及复发性肩关节不稳的相关危险因素:一项系统评价
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2024 May 1;19(5):522-534. doi: 10.26603/001c.116278. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
What is the Difference in Morphologic Features of the Thoracic Pedicle Between Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis and Healthy Subjects? A CT-based Case-control Study.青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者与健康受试者胸椎椎弓根形态学特征的差异是什么?一项基于CT的病例对照研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Nov;475(11):2765-2774. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5448-9. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
2
Hill-Sachs Off-track Lesions as Risk Factor for Recurrence of Instability After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair.Hill-Sachs偏离轨迹损伤作为关节镜下Bankart修复术后不稳定复发的危险因素
Arthroscopy. 2016 Oct;32(10):1993-1999. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.03.005. Epub 2016 May 7.
3
Multidirectional Instability of the Shoulder: A Systematic Review.
肩关节多向不稳定:一项系统评价
Arthroscopy. 2015 Dec;31(12):2431-43. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.06.006. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
4
Utility of the Instability Severity Index Score in Predicting Failure After Arthroscopic Anterior Stabilization of the Shoulder.不稳定严重程度指数评分在预测肩关节镜下前路稳定术后失败中的效用
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Aug;43(8):1983-8. doi: 10.1177/0363546515587083. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
5
Risk factors which predispose first-time traumatic anterior shoulder dislocations to recurrent instability in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.导致成人首次创伤性前肩关节脱位复发不稳定的危险因素:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Sports Med. 2015 Jul;49(14):913-22. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-094342. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
6
Management of primary acute anterior shoulder dislocation: systematic review and quantitative synthesis of the literature.原发性急性前肩盂脱位的治疗:文献的系统回顾和定量综合。
Arthroscopy. 2014 Apr;30(4):506-22. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.01.003.
7
The effect of humeral avulsion of the glenohumeral ligaments and humeral repair site on joint laxity: a biomechanical study.肩盂肱韧带肱骨撕脱及肱骨修复部位对关节松弛的影响:一项生物力学研究。
Arthroscopy. 2013 Jun;29(6):990-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.02.021. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
8
Appendicular joint dislocations.四肢关节脱位。
Injury. 2013 Aug;44(8):1022-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.01.043. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
9
Glenoid and humeral head bone loss in traumatic anterior glenohumeral instability: a systematic review.创伤性前肩关节盂肱关节不稳中盂肱关节窝与肱骨头骨质流失的系统评价
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Feb;22(2):392-414. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2403-5. Epub 2013 Jan 29.
10
Traumatic anterior shoulder instability in the athlete.运动员外伤性前肩不稳定
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2013 Aug;23(4):387-405. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2012.01494.x. Epub 2012 Jun 28.