Sayar H, Shen Z, Lee S J, Royce M, Rabinowitz I, Lee F, Smith H, Eberhardt S, Maestas A, Lu H, Verschraegen C
The University of Indiana Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Invest New Drugs. 2009 Apr;27(2):153-8. doi: 10.1007/s10637-008-9172-x. Epub 2008 Sep 5.
This phase I trial assessed the safety and the maximum tolerated dose of capecitabine given for 10 days prior to a combination of cisplatin and irinotecan in patients with advanced solid malignancies. It also evaluated the changes in cisplatin DNA adducts induced by capecitabine.
Patients with refractory solid tumors who had not failed 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) analogs or topoisomerase I inhibitors were eligible. All cohorts of patients first received a 28-day cycle of cisplatin and irinotecan. Both drugs were given at a dose of 50 mg/m(2) intravenously on day 1, followed by irinotecan on days 8 and 15 at the same dose. The first cycle served as an internal control. Starting from the second cycle, patients received increasing doses per cohort of capecitabine from day 1 to 10 of each cycle, followed by cisplatin on day 11 and irinotecan on days 11, 18 and 25, both at same doses as the first cycle. Cycles were repeated every 38 days. The starting dose of capecitabine was 500 mg/m(2)/day which was escalated by 250 mg/m(2)/day in the subsequent cohort of patients to reach the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Later, additional patients were treated at the MTD of capecitabine to further evaluate the safety, pharmacodynamics, and tumor response. Patients blood was tested for cisplatin-DNA adducts to determine the impact of capecitabine on cisplatin-based therapy.
Fifteen patients received at least 2 cycles of treatment. At 1,250 mg/m(2), two DLT of prolonged neutropenia of grade > or =3 were observed. The MTD for capecitabine was thus determined to be 1000 mg/m(2)/day. Fatigue and diarrhea of grade 1 or 2 were the most frequent toxicities at this dose level. No significant hematologic toxicity was observed at the MTD. Two complete and three partial remissions were observed. Four of the responders had received a platinum agent and/or 5-FU in the past.
A sequential treatment with capecitabine followed by cisplatin and irinotecan is well tolerated and demonstrates clinical activity in patients with advanced solid malignancies. The influence of capecitabine, if any, on the efficacy of the cisplatin-irinotecan combination is not related to a variation in cisplatin-DNA adducts.
本I期试验评估了卡培他滨在晚期实体恶性肿瘤患者中,于顺铂和伊立替康联合用药前10天给药的安全性和最大耐受剂量。它还评估了卡培他滨诱导的顺铂DNA加合物的变化。
未对5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)类似物或拓扑异构酶I抑制剂治疗失败的难治性实体瘤患者符合条件。所有患者队列首先接受28天周期的顺铂和伊立替康治疗。两种药物均在第1天静脉注射,剂量为50mg/m²,然后在第8天和第15天给予相同剂量的伊立替康。第一个周期作为内部对照。从第二个周期开始,每个队列的患者在每个周期的第1天至第10天接受递增剂量的卡培他滨,然后在第11天给予顺铂,在第11天、第18天和第25天给予伊立替康,剂量均与第一个周期相同。每38天重复一个周期。卡培他滨的起始剂量为500mg/m²/天,在随后的患者队列中以250mg/m²/天的幅度递增,以达到最大耐受剂量(MTD)。后来,另外的患者接受卡培他滨MTD剂量的治疗,以进一步评估安全性、药效学和肿瘤反应。检测患者血液中的顺铂-DNA加合物,以确定卡培他滨对基于顺铂的治疗的影响。
15名患者接受了至少2个周期的治疗。在1250mg/m²剂量时,观察到2例≥3级的长期中性粒细胞减少的剂量限制性毒性(DLT)。因此,卡培他滨的MTD确定为1000mg/m²/天。在该剂量水平,1级或2级疲劳和腹泻是最常见的毒性反应。在MTD剂量下未观察到明显的血液学毒性。观察到2例完全缓解和3例部分缓解。4名缓解者过去曾接受过铂类药物和/或5-FU治疗。
卡培他滨序贯顺铂和伊立替康治疗耐受性良好,在晚期实体恶性肿瘤患者中显示出临床活性。卡培他滨对顺铂-伊立替康联合疗效的影响(如果有)与顺铂-DNA加合物的变化无关。