Jefford Michael, Michael Michael, Rosenthal Mark A, Davis Ian D, Green Michael, McClure Bev, Smith Jennifer, Waite Brigid, Zalcberg John
Centre for Developmental Cancer Therapeutics, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Invest New Drugs. 2004 Apr;22(2):185-92. doi: 10.1023/B:DRUG.0000011796.20332.a9.
We conducted a dose escalation study combining cisplatin, irinotecan, and capecitabine (CIC), aiming to establish the maximum tolerated doses (MTD), side effect profile, and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of this novel regimen.
Intravenous cisplatin and irinotecan were to be administered on days 1 and 8, and oral capecitabine on days 1-14 of a 3-week cycle. The study was conducted in three parts. Part A: escalating doses of irinotecan (40 --> 80 mg/m2) and capecitabine (1000 --> 3300 mg/d) combined with a fixed dose of cisplatin (30 mg/m2). Part B: escalating doses of irinotecan (MTD-A --> MTD-A + 40 mg/m2) with fixed doses of cisplatin (20 mg/m2) and capecitabine (MTD-A level). Part C: escalating doses of capecitabine (1300 mg/d-->2600 mg/d) with fixed doses of cisplatin (20 mg/m2) and irinotecan (60 mg/m2).
Of 51 eligible patients 27 (53%) were male, median age was 58 years and 88% had PS 0-1. Major primary disease sites were colorectal (24%), unknown (14%), stomach (14%), and pancreas (12%). MTD-A was cisplatin 30 mg/m2, irinotecan 60 mg/m2, capecitabine 1000 mg/d and MTD-B was cisplatin 20 mg/m2, irinotecan 90 mg/m2, capecitabine 1000 mg/d. An MTD was not formally established for part C. DLTs consisted of infection with neutropenia (1), diarrhea and fatigue (1), hypokalemia (1), diarrhea and febrile neutropenia (1) and C2 delay of > or = 2 weeks or 25% dose reduction in C1 due to neutropenia or thrombocytopenia (6). Seven patients had a partial response to treatment (four colorectal, one SCLC, one NSCLC, one unknown primary), twenty seven SD (53%), twelve PD (24%) and five NE (10%).
CIC was associated with moderate toxicity and only modest antitumor activity. We conclude that this regimen has insufficient activity to justify further study in the phase II setting.
我们开展了一项剂量递增研究,将顺铂、伊立替康和卡培他滨(CIC)联合使用,旨在确定这一新型方案的最大耐受剂量(MTD)、副作用特征及剂量限制毒性(DLT)。
在为期3周的周期中,第1天和第8天静脉注射顺铂和伊立替康,第1 - 14天口服卡培他滨。该研究分三个部分进行。A部分:递增伊立替康剂量(40 --> 80 mg/m²)和卡培他滨剂量(1000 --> 3300 mg/d),同时联合固定剂量的顺铂(30 mg/m²)。B部分:递增伊立替康剂量(MTD - A --> MTD - A + 40 mg/m²),同时联合固定剂量的顺铂(20 mg/m²)和卡培他滨(MTD - A水平)。C部分:递增卡培他滨剂量(1300 mg/d-->2600 mg/d),同时联合固定剂量的顺铂(20 mg/m²)和伊立替康(60 mg/m²)。
51例符合条件的患者中,27例(53%)为男性,中位年龄58岁,88%的患者体能状态(PS)为0 - 1。主要原发疾病部位为结直肠癌(24%)、不明(14%)、胃癌(14%)和胰腺癌(12%)。A部分的MTD为顺铂30 mg/m²、伊立替康60 mg/m²、卡培他滨1000 mg/d,B部分的MTD为顺铂20 mg/m²、伊立替康90 mg/m²、卡培他滨1000 mg/d。C部分未正式确定MTD。DLT包括中性粒细胞减少伴感染(1例)、腹泻和疲劳(1例)、低钾血症(1例)、腹泻和发热性中性粒细胞减少(1例)以及由于中性粒细胞减少或血小板减少导致C2期延迟≥2周或C1期剂量降低25%(6例)。7例患者治疗后部分缓解(4例结直肠癌、1例小细胞肺癌、1例非小细胞肺癌、1例原发不明),27例疾病稳定(53%),12例疾病进展(24%),5例疗效未评价(10%)。
CIC方案毒性中等,抗肿瘤活性有限。我们得出结论,该方案活性不足,不值得在II期研究中进一步探索。