Fallis Wendy M, McClement Susan, Pereira Asha
Clinical Institute of Applied Research and Education, Victoria General Hospital, Winnipeg.
Dynamics. 2008 Fall;19(3):22-8.
The practice of allowing family members to be present at the bedside during cardiopulmonary resuscitation is a controversial one and represents a paradigm shift among health care providers. To date, no research has examined this issue from the perspective of Canadian critical care nurses.
This research was undertaken to identify the practices and preferences of Canadian critical care nurses regarding family presence during resuscitation (FPDR), the extent to which formal FPDR policies exist in hospitals, and the level of awareness among members of the Canadian Association of Critical Care Nurses (CACCN) regarding CACCN's position statement on FPDR. A secondary objective was to compare responses from Canadian critical care nurses to the responses of American critical care and ER nurses in a 2003 survey.
An 18-item online survey was sent to 944 members of CACCN.
The response rate was 47.7% (n = 450). The majority of respondents (92%) supported the option of FPDR in critical care; slightly more than their U.S. counterparts (76%). Within the last year, although fewer Canadian nurses (18.5%) compared with American nurses (31%) had been asked by family members to be brought to the bedside during CPR, the majority of both Canadian nurses (65%) and American nurses (57%) reported they had either taken a family member to the bedside, or would do so if the opportunity arose. Only 8% of Canadian respondents reported that written guidelines/policies for FPDR were available in their hospital (5% for U.S. survey respondents). Half (49.8%) of the respondents were aware that CACCN had a position statement on FPDR.
Although guidelines or policies for FPDR are not available in most hospitals where respondents worked, the majority of critical care nurses support FPDR and either had taken or would be willing to take family members to the bedside during CPR. The willingness of nurses in critical care to support FPDR suggests the need for more formal policies in hospitals and the development of algorithms to facilitate this process.
允许家庭成员在心肺复苏期间在床边陪伴的做法存在争议,并且代表了医疗保健提供者之间的一种范式转变。迄今为止,尚无研究从加拿大重症护理护士的角度审视这一问题。
本研究旨在确定加拿大重症护理护士在复苏期间家庭成员陪伴(FPDR)方面的做法和偏好、医院中正式的FPDR政策的存在程度,以及加拿大重症护理护士协会(CACCN)成员对CACCN关于FPDR的立场声明的知晓程度。次要目的是在2003年的一项调查中,将加拿大重症护理护士的回答与美国重症护理和急诊护士的回答进行比较。
向944名CACCN成员发送了一份包含18个条目的在线调查问卷。
回复率为47.7%(n = 450)。大多数受访者(92%)支持在重症护理中采用FPDR这一选择;略高于美国同行(76%)。在过去一年中,尽管与美国护士(31%)相比,较少的加拿大护士(18.5%)被家庭成员要求在心肺复苏期间带到床边,但大多数加拿大护士(65%)和美国护士(57%)报告称他们要么已将家庭成员带到床边,要么如果有机会就会这样做。只有8%的加拿大受访者报告称其所在医院有关于FPDR的书面指南/政策(美国调查受访者为5%)。一半(49.8%)的受访者知晓CACCN有关于FPDR的立场声明。
尽管大多数受访者所在医院没有关于FPDR的指南或政策,但大多数重症护理护士支持FPDR,并且要么已经在心肺复苏期间将家庭成员带到床边,要么愿意这样做。重症护理护士支持FPDR的意愿表明医院需要更正式的政策以及制定相关流程来推动这一过程。