Suppr超能文献

允许患者家属参与心脏复苏是否有益:不同文化视角?一项范围综述

Is it beneficial to allow the patient's family to attend cardiac resuscitation: Different cultural perspectives? A scoping review.

作者信息

Abualruz Hasan, Sabra Mohammad A Abu, Othman Elham H, Malak Malakeh Z, Omar Saleh Al, Safadi Reema R, AbuRuz Salah M, Suleiman Khaled

机构信息

Faculty of Nursing, Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.

School of Nursing, The University of Jordan-Aqaba Campus, Aqaba, Jordan.

出版信息

J Intensive Med. 2024 Dec 18;5(2):202-210. doi: 10.1016/j.jointm.2024.11.002. eCollection 2025 Apr.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Family presence during resuscitation (FPDR) is a controversial issue that remains unresolved in contemporary practice. Although there are many research studies on FPDR and several published statements and guidelines supporting FPDR by international organizations, no conclusive position guides clinicians in making a decision. A scoping review was conducted to discuss the different healthcare professionals (HCPs) and cultural perspectives toward family presence during CPR is conducted.

METHODS

Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines, we screened 797 studies published between 2000 and 2022 from the databases including Springer Link, MEDLINE, Pro-Quest Central, CINAHL Plus, and Google Scholar. All articles were filtered using inclusion criteria to eliminate redundant, irrelevant, and unnecessary content.

RESULTS

A total of 34 studies that fulfill the eligibility criteria reported that there are multiple perspectives from HCPs and families about FPDR. HCPs felt that their performance had improved during resuscitation and received family support in breaking the bad news of death. Family relatives who attended cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) had less stress, less anxiety, more positive grieving behavior, and enhanced family members' decision-making. Contrastingly, some HCPs were against FPDR because they were concerned about the family's misinterpretation of resuscitation activities, psychological trauma to the family members, increased stress levels among staff, and worry about an unexpected response from the distressed family.

CONCLUSIONS

It is important to consider the culture and awareness of families when deciding on FPDR. It is the responsibility of HCPs to assess family members' willingness and the benefits they attain from attending CPR. The decision should be based on the given situation, cultural context and beliefs, and current policy to guide practice.

摘要

背景

复苏期间家属在场(FPDR)是一个存在争议的问题,在当代实践中仍未得到解决。尽管有许多关于FPDR的研究,以及国际组织发表的几份支持FPDR的声明和指南,但没有确凿的立场指导临床医生做出决定。本研究进行了一项范围综述,以探讨不同医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)对心肺复苏期间家属在场的不同文化观点。

方法

使用系统评价和Meta分析扩展的首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR)指南,我们从包括Springer Link、MEDLINE、Pro-Quest Central、CINAHL Plus和谷歌学术在内的数据库中筛选了2000年至2022年发表的797项研究。所有文章均根据纳入标准进行筛选,以消除冗余、无关和不必要的内容。

结果

共有34项符合资格标准报告称,HCPs和家属对FPDR有多种观点。HCPs认为他们在复苏期间的表现有所改善,并在告知死亡坏消息时得到了家属的支持。参与心肺复苏(CPR)的家属压力更小、焦虑更少、悲伤行为更积极,并且增强了家庭成员的决策能力。相反,一些HCPs反对FPDR,因为他们担心家属对复苏活动的误解、对家庭成员的心理创伤、工作人员压力水平的增加以及对痛苦家属意外反应的担忧。

结论

在决定是否实施FPDR时,考虑家属的文化和意识很重要。评估家庭成员的意愿以及他们从参与CPR中获得的益处是HCPs的责任。该决定应基于具体情况、文化背景和信仰以及当前政策来指导实践。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验