Suppr超能文献

在军事初级保健机构中对单项创伤后应激障碍筛查工具的测试。

Test of a single-item posttraumatic stress disorder screener in a military primary care setting.

作者信息

Gore Kristie L, Engel Charles C, Freed Michael C, Liu Xian, Armstrong David W

机构信息

Deployment Health Clinical Center, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC 20307, USA.

出版信息

Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2008 Sep-Oct;30(5):391-7. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2008.05.002. Epub 2008 Jul 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is prevalent in primary care, frequently goes undetected and can be highly debilitating when untreated.

OBJECTIVE

We assessed the operating characteristics of a single-item PTSD screener (SIPS) for primary care and compared it to a commonly used four-item primary care PTSD screener (PC-PTSD). The SIPS asks: "Were you recently bothered by a past experience that caused you to believe you would be injured or killed ... not bothered, bothered a little, or bothered a lot?"

METHODS

A total of 3,234 patients from three Washington, DC, area military primary care clinics completed the SIPS. Independent, blinded assessments using a structured diagnostic PTSD interview were completed in 213 of these patients.

RESULTS

The SIPS yielded a reasonable range of likelihood ratios, suggesting capacity to discriminate between low- and high-probability PTSD patients. However, the SIPS sensitivity was only 76% for those reporting "bothered a little" and the four-item PC-PTSD yielded significantly better test characteristics on Receiver-Operator Curve analysis.

CONCLUSION

A single, user-friendly primary care PTSD screening question with three response options, while sensible and worth further investigation, failed to offer sound test characteristics for PTSD screening. Ways of improving SIPS performance are discussed.

摘要

背景

创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)在初级保健中很常见,常常未被发现,若不治疗会导致严重功能障碍。

目的

我们评估了一项用于初级保健的单项PTSD筛查工具(SIPS)的操作特征,并将其与常用的四项初级保健PTSD筛查工具(PC-PTSD)进行比较。SIPS的问题是:“你最近是否因过去的一段经历而烦恼,这段经历让你觉得自己会受伤或死亡……没有烦恼、有点烦恼还是非常烦恼?”

方法

来自华盛顿特区地区三家军事初级保健诊所的3234名患者完成了SIPS测试。其中213名患者通过结构化诊断PTSD访谈进行了独立、盲法评估。

结果

SIPS产生了合理范围的似然比,表明其有能力区分低概率和高概率PTSD患者。然而,对于那些报告“有点烦恼”的人,SIPS的敏感性仅为76%,并且在受试者工作特征曲线分析中,四项PC-PTSD的测试特征明显更好。

结论

一个具有三个回答选项的、对用户友好的单项初级保健PTSD筛查问题,虽然合理且值得进一步研究,但未能为PTSD筛查提供良好的测试特征。文中讨论了改善SIPS性能的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验