• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用戴维森创伤量表和SPAN进行创伤后应激障碍的早期预后筛查。

Early prognostic screening for posttraumatic stress disorder with the Davidson Trauma Scale and the SPAN.

作者信息

Sijbrandij Marit, Olff Miranda, Opmeer Brent C, Carlier Ingrid V E, Gersons Berthold P R

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Centre for Psychological Trauma, Academic Medical Centre of the University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Depress Anxiety. 2008;25(12):1038-45. doi: 10.1002/da.20441.

DOI:10.1002/da.20441
PMID:19016483
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study examined the accuracy of the 17-item Dutch version of the Davidson Trauma Scale (DTS) and the four-item SPAN (Startle, Physiological Arousal, Anger and Numbness) to detect survivors at risk for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) within the first 2 weeks after the trauma.

METHODS

203 civilian survivors of recent trauma with relatively mild symptoms completed the DTS a mean of 8.7 days after experiencing trauma. SPAN scores were computed from the DTS. At a mean of 64.6 days posttrauma, 160 respondents were assessed for diagnosis of PTSD with the Structured Interview for PTSD.

RESULTS

Receiver operating characteristic curves showed that the DTS showed good overall screening accuracy (84%). At a cut-off value of 64, the DTS demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.86, a specificity of 0.70, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.12, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.98. Overall accuracy of the SPAN was good (89%). At a cut-off of 10 the SPAN showed a sensitivity of 0.86, a specificity of 0.86, a PPV of 0.22, and a NPV of 0.98. The low PPVs were possibly due to the low of prevalence of PTSD in our sample (4.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that both the DTS and the SPAN are comparably accurate in screening early trauma survivors at risk for developing PTSD. The very brief four-item SPAN may be preferred over the longer 17-item DTS especially in settings in which time and resources are limited. Future studies should aim to cross-validate these results in random samples.

摘要

背景

本研究检验了17项荷兰版戴维森创伤量表(DTS)和四项简版量表SPAN(惊吓、生理唤醒、愤怒和麻木)在创伤后前两周内检测创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)风险幸存者的准确性。

方法

203名近期遭受创伤且症状相对较轻的平民幸存者在经历创伤后平均8.7天完成了DTS量表测试。SPAN分数由DTS量表计算得出。在创伤后平均64.6天时,对160名受访者进行了PTSD结构化访谈以评估PTSD诊断情况。

结果

受试者工作特征曲线显示,DTS量表总体筛查准确性良好(84%)。在临界值为64时,DTS量表的灵敏度为0.86,特异度为0.70,阳性预测值(PPV)为0.12,阴性预测值(NPV)为0.98。SPAN量表的总体准确性良好(89%)。在临界值为10时,SPAN量表的灵敏度为0.86,特异度为0.86,PPV为0.22,NPV为0.98。较低的PPV可能是由于我们样本中PTSD的患病率较低(4.4%)。

结论

本研究表明,DTS量表和SPAN量表在筛查早期有患PTSD风险的创伤幸存者方面具有相当的准确性。特别是在时间和资源有限的情况下,非常简短的四项简版量表SPAN可能比更长的17项DTS量表更受青睐。未来的研究应旨在对随机样本中的这些结果进行交叉验证。

相似文献

1
Early prognostic screening for posttraumatic stress disorder with the Davidson Trauma Scale and the SPAN.使用戴维森创伤量表和SPAN进行创伤后应激障碍的早期预后筛查。
Depress Anxiety. 2008;25(12):1038-45. doi: 10.1002/da.20441.
2
The Chinese version of the Davidson Trauma Scale: a practice test for validation.《戴维森创伤量表》中文版:一项验证性预试验。
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2001 Oct;55(5):493-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1819.2001.00895.x.
3
The validation study and application of stratum-specific likelihood ratios in the Chinese version of SPAN.中文版 SPAN 中特定分层似然比的验证研究与应用
Compr Psychiatry. 2003 Jan-Feb;44(1):78-81. doi: 10.1053/comp.2003.50013.
4
Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Davidson Trauma Scale.《戴维森创伤量表》韩文版的信度与效度
Compr Psychiatry. 2008 May-Jun;49(3):313-8. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2007.10.007. Epub 2007 Dec 21.
5
Screening for post-traumatic stress disorder among refugees in Stockholm.斯德哥尔摩难民创伤后应激障碍筛查
Nord J Psychiatry. 2003;57(3):185-9. doi: 10.1080/08039480310001328.
6
Screening for posttraumatic stress disorder in children after accidental injury.意外伤害后儿童创伤后应激障碍的筛查
Pediatrics. 2006 Sep;118(3):1002-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0406.
7
Psychometric properties of seven self-report measures of posttraumatic stress disorder in college students with mixed civilian trauma exposure.遭受多种平民创伤的大学生中七种创伤后应激障碍自评量表的心理测量特性。
J Anxiety Disord. 2008 Dec;22(8):1393-402. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2008.02.002. Epub 2008 Feb 29.
8
Validation of a screening instrument for posttraumatic stress disorder in a community sample of Bedouin men serving in the Israeli Defense Forces.在以色列国防军服役的贝都因男性社区样本中对创伤后应激障碍筛查工具的验证。
J Trauma Stress. 2007 Aug;20(4):517-27. doi: 10.1002/jts.20237.
9
Prevalence and risk factors for posttraumatic stress disorder: a cross-sectional study among survivors of the Wenchuan 2008 earthquake in China.创伤后应激障碍的患病率及其危险因素:中国汶川 2008 年地震幸存者的横断面研究。
Depress Anxiety. 2009;26(12):1134-40. doi: 10.1002/da.20612.
10
A brief screening instrument to detect posttraumatic stress disorder in outpatient gynecology.一种用于在妇科门诊检测创伤后应激障碍的简易筛查工具。
Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Oct;104(4):770-6. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000140683.43272.85.

引用本文的文献

1
An Exploratory Study about Factors and Outcomes Associated with the Experience of Coercive Measures in Mental Health Settings.一项关于精神卫生机构中强制手段体验的相关因素及结果的探索性研究。
Psychiatr Q. 2025 Mar;96(1):133-144. doi: 10.1007/s11126-024-10110-w. Epub 2025 Jan 16.
2
Screening for consequences of trauma - an update on the global collaboration on traumatic stress.创伤后果筛查——创伤应激全球合作的最新情况
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2020 Apr 27;11(1):1752504. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2020.1752504. eCollection 2020.
3
Negative body experience in women with early childhood trauma: associations with trauma severity and dissociation.
有童年早期创伤经历女性的负面身体体验:与创伤严重程度及解离的关联
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2017 May 31;8(1):1322892. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2017.1322892. eCollection 2017.
4
Consistency and factorial invariance of the Davidson trauma scale in heterogeneous populations: results from the 2010 Chilean earthquake.不同人群中 Davidson 创伤量表的一致性和因子不变性:来自 2010 年智利地震的结果。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2017 Sep;26(3). doi: 10.1002/mpr.1516. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
5
Creative arts program as an intervention for PTSD: a randomized clinical trial with motor vehicle accident survivors.创意艺术项目作为创伤后应激障碍的一种干预措施:一项针对机动车事故幸存者的随机临床试验。
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Aug 15;8(8):13585-91. eCollection 2015.
6
A Comparison of Sleep Difficulties among Iraq/Afghanistan Theater Veterans with and without Mental Health Diagnoses.有心理健康诊断与无心理健康诊断的伊拉克/阿富汗战区退伍军人睡眠困难情况比较
J Clin Sleep Med. 2015 Sep 15;11(9):995-1005. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.5012.
7
Associations between sleep difficulties and risk factors for cardiovascular disease in veterans and active duty military personnel of the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts.伊拉克和阿富汗冲突中的退伍军人及现役军人睡眠困难与心血管疾病风险因素之间的关联。
J Behav Med. 2015 Jun;38(3):544-55. doi: 10.1007/s10865-015-9627-4. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
8
Comparing screening instruments to predict posttraumatic stress disorder.比较用于预测创伤后应激障碍的筛查工具。
PLoS One. 2014 May 9;9(5):e97183. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097183. eCollection 2014.
9
Anxiety Specific Pathways to HIV Sexual Transmission Risk Behavior among Young Gay and Bisexual Men.年轻男同性恋者和双性恋男性中导致感染艾滋病毒性传播风险行为的焦虑特定途径。
J Gay Lesbian Ment Health. 2013 Jan 1;17(3):314-326. doi: 10.1080/19359705.2012.755142.
10
Internet-based early intervention to prevent posttraumatic stress disorder in injury patients: randomized controlled trial.基于互联网的早期干预预防创伤患者创伤后应激障碍:随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Aug 13;15(8):e165. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2460.