Ang Mei-Kim, Hee Siew Wan, Quek Richard, Yap Swee Peng, Loong Susan, Tan Leonard, Tao Miriam, Lim Soon Thye
Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore.
Ann Hematol. 2009 May;88(5):417-24. doi: 10.1007/s00277-008-0604-7. Epub 2008 Sep 7.
Gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma and diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) show a spectrum of disease characterized by varying proportions of low-grade and high-grade components. While the natural history and optimum treatment for low-grade gastric MALT lymphoma and DLBCL is well established, the prognosis and optimal treatment of patients with both low- and high-grade components is not well established. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics, survival outcomes, and prognostic factors of patients with gastric MALT lymphoma and gastric DLBCL. A retrospective review of patients with gastric MALT lymphoma, gastric DLBCL, or MALT lymphoma with a high-grade component treated at our centers from 1994 to 2006 was performed. Patients were divided into three categories: "pure MALT lymphoma," "MALT lymphoma with high-grade component" (mixed), and "pure DLBCL." Seventy-six patients were included in our study-26 with pure MALT, 22 with MALT with high-grade component ("mixed"), and 28 with pure DLBCL. Pure MALT lymphoma and mixed lymphoma patients had similar clinical characteristics, whereas pure DLBCL patients had less favorable disease characteristics with significantly poorer performance status, higher number of extranodal sites of disease, higher stage, and larger proportion of bone marrow involvement and international prognostic index (IPI) scores compared with mixed lymphoma. The majority of mixed lymphoma (72.7%) and DLBCL patients (71.4%) were treated with chemotherapy. Of patients receiving chemotherapy, a higher proportion of mixed lymphoma and DLBCL patients received anthracycline-based combination chemotherapy regimens compared with MALT lymphoma (73% vs 71% vs 8%) whereas the proportion of mixed lymphoma and DLBCL patients was similar (p = 0.919). At a median follow-up of 37 months, the 5-year overall survival was 66.9%. The 5-year overall survival was 78% for MALT lymphoma, 84% for mixed lymphoma, and 45% for DLBCL. On univariate analysis, DLBCL histology, age, performance status, serum albumin, lactate dehydrogenase, bone marrow, number of extranodal sites, stage, and IPI score were prognostic for inferior survival. On multivariate analysis, DLBCL histology remained significantly prognostic for inferior survival, independent of chemotherapy regimen (hazard ratio (HR) 6.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.01-21.41, p = 0.001). Mixed histology was not prognostic for inferior survival (HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.28-4.54, p = 0.868). Other factors prognostic for inferior survival were serum albumin <37 g/L (HR 3.22, 95% CI 1.11-13.22, p = 0.034) and treatment with non-cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone chemotherapy (HR 4.89, 95% CI 1.67-14.36, p = 0.004). In conclusion, the clinical characteristics of mixed histology MALT lymphoma are similar to low-grade MALT lymphoma and significantly different from pure DLBCL. The prognosis of mixed histology MALT lymphoma is significantly better than pure DLBCL, independent of IPI and chemotherapy regimen, and pure DLBCL histology is independently prognostic of inferior survival outcome.
胃黏膜相关淋巴组织(MALT)淋巴瘤和弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)呈现出一系列疾病特征,其低级别和高级别成分比例各异。虽然低级别胃MALT淋巴瘤和DLBCL的自然病史及最佳治疗方法已明确,但同时具有低级别和高级别成分的患者的预后及最佳治疗方案尚未明确。我们研究的目的是评估胃MALT淋巴瘤和胃DLBCL患者的临床特征、生存结果及预后因素。对1994年至2006年在我们中心接受治疗的胃MALT淋巴瘤、胃DLBCL或伴有高级别成分的MALT淋巴瘤患者进行了回顾性研究。患者分为三类:“纯MALT淋巴瘤”、“伴有高级别成分的MALT淋巴瘤”(混合型)和“纯DLBCL”。我们的研究纳入了76例患者,其中26例为纯MALT淋巴瘤,22例为伴有高级别成分的MALT淋巴瘤(“混合型”),28例为纯DLBCL。纯MALT淋巴瘤和混合型淋巴瘤患者具有相似的临床特征,而纯DLBCL患者的疾病特征较差,其体能状态明显更差、结外病变部位数量更多、分期更高、骨髓受累比例和国际预后指数(IPI)评分更高,与混合型淋巴瘤相比差异显著。大多数混合型淋巴瘤(72.7%)和DLBCL患者(71.4%)接受了化疗。在接受化疗的患者中,与MALT淋巴瘤相比,更高比例的混合型淋巴瘤和DLBCL患者接受了含蒽环类药物的联合化疗方案(73%对71%对8%),而混合型淋巴瘤和DLBCL患者的比例相似(p = 0.919)。中位随访37个月时,5年总生存率为66.9%。MALT淋巴瘤的5年总生存率为78%,混合型淋巴瘤为84%,DLBCL为45%。单因素分析显示,DLBCL组织学类型、年龄、体能状态、血清白蛋白、乳酸脱氢酶、骨髓、结外病变部位数量、分期和IPI评分对生存预后较差具有预测意义。多因素分析显示,DLBCL组织学类型仍然是生存预后较差的显著预测因素,与化疗方案无关(风险比(HR)6.66,95%置信区间(CI)2.01 - 21.41,p = 0.001)。混合型组织学类型对生存预后较差无预测意义(HR 1.13,95% CI 0.28 - 4.54,p = 0.868)。其他生存预后较差的预测因素包括血清白蛋白<37 g/L(HR 3.22,95% CI 1.11 - 13.22,p = 0.034)以及接受非环磷酰胺、多柔比星、长春新碱和泼尼松龙化疗(HR 4.89,95% CI 1.67 - 14.36,p = 0.004)。总之,混合型组织学MALT淋巴瘤的临床特征与低级别MALT淋巴瘤相似,与纯DLBCL显著不同。混合型组织学MALT淋巴瘤的预后明显优于纯DLBCL,与IPI和化疗方案无关,且纯DLBCL组织学类型是生存预后较差的独立预测因素。