Oki Yasuhiro, Yamamoto Kazuhito, Kato Harumi, Kuwatsuka Yachiyo, Taji Hirofumi, Kagami Yoshitoyo, Morishima Yasuo
Department of Hematology and Cell Therapy, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Eur J Haematol. 2008 Dec;81(6):448-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2008.01129.x. Epub 2008 Aug 6.
To evaluate the prognostic value of absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) at diagnosis in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).
In a large cohort of patients with DLBCL treated with CHOP (n = 119) or RCHOP (n = 102) in our institution, we evaluated the prognostic value of ALC at diagnosis with regards to treatment response, overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Use of rituximab, all International Prognostic Index (IPI) determinants, beta2microglobulin level, presence of B symptoms or bulky disease, and ALC were evaluated.
Low ALC (<1.0 x 10(9)/L) was associated with advanced stage, performance status >or=2, elevated lactate dehydrogenase, number of extranodal involvement >or=2, B symptoms, elevated beta2microglobulin and higher IPI risk group. Low ALC was associated with lower CR rate by univariate analysis (odds ratio = 3.29, P = 0.024) but not by multivariate analysis. By univariate analysis using Cox proportional hazard model, low ALC was associated with shorter OS [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.89, P < 0.001] and PFS (HR = 2.91, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that low ALC was associated with shorter OS (HR = 2.51, P = 0.003) and PFS (HR = 2.72, P < 0.001), independent of above-mentioned parameters. Subclass analyses revealed that the use of rituximab improves OS in patients with low ALC (HR = 0.42, P = 0.05) but not in those with high ALC (HR = 0.83, P = 0.71). This observation was most obvious in patients with higher IPI score.
Low ALC is a poor prognostic marker in patients with DLBCL and suggests patients' survival benefit from rituximab.
评估弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者诊断时绝对淋巴细胞计数(ALC)的预后价值。
在我们机构接受CHOP(n = 119)或RCHOP(n = 102)治疗的一大群DLBCL患者中,我们评估了诊断时ALC对于治疗反应、总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)的预后价值。评估了利妥昔单抗的使用、所有国际预后指数(IPI)决定因素、β2微球蛋白水平、B症状或大包块病的存在以及ALC。
低ALC(<1.0×10⁹/L)与晚期、体能状态≥2、乳酸脱氢酶升高、结外受累部位数量≥2、B症状、β2微球蛋白升高以及较高的IPI风险组相关。单因素分析显示低ALC与较低的完全缓解率相关(优势比 = 3.29,P = 0.024),但多因素分析未显示相关性。使用Cox比例风险模型进行单因素分析,低ALC与较短的OS [风险比(HR) = 2.89,P < 0.001]和PFS(HR = 2.91,P < 0.001)相关。多因素分析显示,低ALC与较短的OS(HR = 2.51,P = 0.003)和PFS(HR = 2.72,P < 0.001)相关,独立于上述参数。亚组分析显示,利妥昔单抗的使用可改善低ALC患者的OS(HR = 0.42,P = 0.05),但对高ALC患者无改善(HR = 0.83,P = 0.71)。这一观察结果在IPI评分较高的患者中最为明显。
低ALC是DLBCL患者的不良预后标志物,提示利妥昔单抗对患者生存有益。