Demuth Katherine, McCullough Elizabeth
Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA.
J Child Lang. 2009 Jan;36(1):173-200. doi: 10.1017/S0305000908008921. Epub 2008 Sep 9.
Researchers have long been puzzled by children's variable omission of grammatical morphemes, often attributing this to a lack of semantic or syntactic competence. Recent studies suggest that some of this variability may be due to phonological constraints. This paper explored this issue further by conducting a longitudinal study of five English-speaking one- to two-year-olds' acquisition of articles. It found that most children were more likely to produce articles when these could be produced as part of a disyllabic foot. However, acoustic analysis revealed that one child initially produced all articles as independent prosodic words. These findings confirm that some of the variable production of articles is conditioned by constraints on children's early phonologies, providing further support for the Prosodic Licensing Hypothesis. They also hold important implications for our understanding of the emergence of syntactic knowledge.
长期以来,研究人员一直对儿童在语法语素省略方面的差异感到困惑,常常将其归因于语义或句法能力的缺乏。最近的研究表明,这种差异的一部分可能是由于语音限制。本文通过对五名说英语的一到两岁儿童习得冠词的纵向研究,进一步探讨了这个问题。研究发现,大多数儿童在冠词可以作为双音节音步的一部分发音时,更有可能说出冠词。然而,声学分析显示,有一个孩子最初将所有冠词都作为独立的韵律词发音。这些发现证实,冠词产出的一些差异是由儿童早期语音的限制所决定的,为韵律许可假说提供了进一步的支持。它们对于我们理解句法知识的出现也具有重要意义。