Bolton D M, Costello A J, Lenaghan D
Victorian Lithotripsy Service, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria.
Aust N Z J Surg. 1991 Sep;61(9):654-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1991.tb00314.x.
The results of treatment of 115 patients with upper and mid-ureteric calculi, using endo-urological manipulation and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy were reviewed. The number of shocks administered, the kilovoltage used, the radiation exposure time and the degree of fragmentation achieved were evaluated. Complications occurring in the course of this treatment were also reviewed. A significantly lower number of impulses was required for fragmentation to be apparent at 24 h post-treatment, when the ureteric calculus was able to be manipulated back into the renal pelvis. However, at 6 weeks post-extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) satisfactory fragmentation was apparent in approximately equal percentages of patients who had undergone successful and unsuccessful manipulation. In addition, a significantly greater mean radiation exposure was used in the treatment of mid-ureteric calculi that could not be successfully manipulated and required treatment in situ within the ureter. These results suggest that treatment of a ureteric calculus in situ within the ureter provides a satisfactory method of fragmentation, although fragmentation takes longer to become apparent than when treatment is undertaken upon a calculus within the renal pelvis. The greater radiation exposure for patients in whom ureteric calculi were treated in in situ within the ureter may reflect the operators' attempts to visualize a change in configuration of the calculus similar to that seen when treatment is given to a stone that has been successfully manipulated. However, since the absence of fragmentation at 24 h post-surgery does not indicate a failed treatment in this group, prolonged screening of the calculus with fluoroscopy may be unnecessary. The complication rate of this method of treatment was low.
回顾了115例上输尿管和中输尿管结石患者采用腔内泌尿外科操作和体外冲击波碎石术的治疗结果。评估了给予的冲击次数、使用的千伏数、辐射暴露时间以及结石破碎程度。还回顾了该治疗过程中出现的并发症。当输尿管结石能够被操作回肾盂时,在治疗后24小时结石破碎明显所需的脉冲数显著减少。然而,在体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)后6周,成功和未成功操作的患者中,结石破碎满意的比例大致相同。此外,在治疗无法成功操作且需要在输尿管内原位治疗的中输尿管结石时,平均辐射暴露显著增加。这些结果表明,在输尿管内原位治疗输尿管结石提供了一种令人满意的碎石方法,尽管与在肾盂内治疗结石相比,结石破碎明显所需的时间更长。输尿管结石在输尿管内原位治疗的患者辐射暴露增加可能反映了操作者试图观察到结石形态的变化,类似于对已成功操作的结石进行治疗时所见。然而,由于术后24小时结石未破碎并不表明该组治疗失败,因此可能无需用荧光透视对结石进行长时间筛查。该治疗方法的并发症发生率较低。