Suppr超能文献

桡骨远端骨折掌侧锁定钢板的生物力学评估

Biomechanical evaluation of volar locking plates for distal radius fractures.

作者信息

Levin Scott M, Nelson Cory O, Botts Jonathan D, Teplitz Glenn A, Kwon Yong, Serra-Hsu Fred

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, T-18 Health Sciences Center, SUNY at Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-8181, USA.

出版信息

Hand (N Y). 2008 Mar;3(1):55-60. doi: 10.1007/s11552-007-9063-1. Epub 2007 Aug 7.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Fixed-angle devices have been a major advancement in orthopedic fracture care and have become an attractive option for fixation of distal radius fractures. Several volar locking plates exist, but there is insufficient literature comparing the strengths of these plates. This study compares the biomechanical strength of two popular volar locking plate systems (Synthes LCP and Hand Innovations DVR-A) along with a nonlocking volar T-plate (Synthes).

METHODS

Twenty-three formalin-fixed cadaveric forearms were divided into three groups with similar ages and bone densities. An unstable extra-articular fracture was created using a standardized osteotomy. Each group was fixed with one of the three plates. Each specimen was loaded in axial compression for 2000 cycles at a force of 400 N. Each specimen that completed cyclic testing was loaded to failure. Stiffness, yield point, and ultimate strength were recorded for each construct.

RESULTS

Each fixed-angle construct completed all 2000 cycles. The nonlocking plates failed at an average of 560 cycles. The mean stiffness of the DVR-A, LCP, and the volar T-plates were 277.00, 343.17, and 175.67 N/mm, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between both fixed-angle plates and the nonlocking plate (p < 0.05). The difference between each fixed-angle construct did not reach significance. Yield point and ultimate strength could only be determined for the two fixed-angle devices. There was no statistically significant difference between the constructs for both yield point (DVR-A = 855.56 N, LCP = 894.15 N) and ultimate strength (DVR-A = 1,021.97 N, LCP = 1,114.87 N).

CONCLUSIONS

Given our data, fixed-angle constructs withstand cyclical loading representing normal physiologic forces encountered during post-operative rehabilitation. There was no significant biomechanical difference between the two fixed-angle constructs. Our results support that volar fixed-angle locking plates are an effective treatment for unstable extra-articular distal radius fractures, allowing early postoperative rehabilitation to safely be initiated.

摘要

目的

角度固定装置是骨科骨折治疗的一项重大进展,已成为桡骨远端骨折固定的一个有吸引力的选择。目前有几种掌侧锁定钢板,但比较这些钢板强度的文献不足。本研究比较了两种常用的掌侧锁定钢板系统(辛迪思有限接触动力加压钢板和手部创新公司的DVR - A钢板)以及一种非锁定掌侧T形钢板(辛迪思)的生物力学强度。

方法

将23个用福尔马林固定的尸体前臂分成年龄和骨密度相似的三组。采用标准化截骨术制造不稳定的关节外骨折。每组用三种钢板中的一种进行固定。每个标本以400 N的力进行轴向压缩加载2000次循环。每个完成循环测试的标本加载直至失效。记录每个结构的刚度、屈服点和极限强度。

结果

每个角度固定结构都完成了所有2000次循环。非锁定钢板平均在560次循环时失效。DVR - A钢板、有限接触动力加压钢板和掌侧T形钢板的平均刚度分别为277.00、343.17和175.67 N/mm。两种角度固定钢板与非锁定钢板之间存在统计学显著差异(p < 0.05)。每种角度固定结构之间的差异未达到显著水平。仅能确定两种角度固定装置的屈服点和极限强度。两种结构在屈服点(DVR - A = 855.56 N,有限接触动力加压钢板 = 894.15 N)和极限强度(DVR - A = 1021.97 N,有限接触动力加压钢板 = 1114.87 N)方面均无统计学显著差异。

结论

根据我们的数据,角度固定结构能够承受代表术后康复期间所遇到的正常生理力的循环加载。两种角度固定结构之间在生物力学上无显著差异。我们的结果支持掌侧角度固定锁定钢板是治疗不稳定关节外桡骨远端骨折的有效方法,可使术后早期康复安全启动。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验