Zhang Jiakai, Zheng Yi, Wu Junlong, Yuan Xinhua
Department of Orthopedics, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang Province, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jun 20;104(25):e42767. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042767.
This study aimed to compare the extended anterolateral approach and the Frosch approach for treating type II tibial plateau fractures (based on the Schatzker classification system) involving the posterolateral column. A retrospective study was undertaken to compare general patient characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes, the Hospital for Special Surgery score, Rasmussen radiology score, tibial plateau angle, and posterior slope angle immediately after surgery and at a 1-year follow-up, between the 2 surgical approaches utilized between 2016 and 2020. Fifty-two patients with Schatzker type II fractures from Ningbo No. 2 Hospital were enrolled. No significant demographic differences existed between the 2 surgical groups. The Frosch approach group had slightly longer operative times but better hospital for special surgery knee scores and Rasmussen radiology scores than the extended anterolateral approach group. Both approaches achieved good outcomes for simple posterolateral fractures. For complex fractures, the Frosch approach may enabled more accurate reduction and superior biomechanical stability.
本研究旨在比较扩大前外侧入路与Frosch入路治疗涉及后外侧柱的Ⅱ型胫骨平台骨折(基于Schatzker分类系统)的效果。进行了一项回顾性研究,比较2016年至2020年间采用的两种手术入路在一般患者特征、术中和术后结果、特种外科医院评分、Rasmussen放射学评分、术后即刻及1年随访时的胫骨平台角和后倾角方面的差异。纳入了来自宁波市第二医院的52例SchatzkerⅡ型骨折患者。两个手术组之间在人口统计学方面无显著差异。Frosch入路组的手术时间略长,但特种外科医院膝关节评分和Rasmussen放射学评分优于扩大前外侧入路组。对于单纯后外侧骨折,两种入路均取得了良好的效果。对于复杂骨折,Frosch入路可能能够实现更精确的复位和更好的生物力学稳定性。