Gao Zhu-Ye, Xu Hao, Chen Ke-Ji, Shi Da-Zhuo, Li Li-Zhi, Zhou Xue-Zhong
Department of Cardiology, Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100091, China.
Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao. 2008 Sep;6(9):902-6. doi: 10.3736/jcim20080905.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical effects of Shengmai Injection in treating coronary heart disease (CHD) based on correct syndrome differentiation and incorrect syndrome differentiation. METHODS: The patients' information was collected through a system of individual diagnosis and treatment of CHD. The score of main symptoms was calculated and recorded during the treatment. Patients were divided into two groups (incorrect syndrome and correct syndrome groups) on the basis of syndrome differentiation treatment or not. The clinical therapeutic effects of the two treatments were evaluated based on statistic theory combined with random walk method. RESULTS: There were 273 patients in the correct syndrome group and 4 patients died (case-fatality rate was 1.47%). There were 297 patients in the incorrect syndrome group and 7 patients died (case-fatality rate was 2.36%). In the correct syndrome group, random fluctuation peak of comprehensive evaluation index, walk steps, positive growth rate of walk, ratio, random fluctuation power-law, increase rate and record times of comprehensive evaluation index were 1 472, 13 617, 0.108 1, 9.25, 0.674 2, 0.470 6 and 3 128 respectively, while in the incorrect syndrome group, 1 030, 14 588, 0.070 6, 14.16, 0.660 6, 0.312 8 and 3 293 respectively. The random fluctuation power-law in both groups exceeded 0.5. CONCLUSION: There is a long-range correlation between the comprehensive evaluation index and therapeutic method as the CHD patients were treated with Shengmai Injection. The clinical therapeutic effects of Shengmai Injection under correct syndrome differentiation are better than the effects of Shengmai Injection under incorrect syndrome differentiation.
目的:基于正确辨证与错误辨证评估生脉注射液治疗冠心病(CHD)的临床疗效。 方法:通过冠心病个体化诊疗系统收集患者信息。治疗期间计算并记录主要症状评分。根据辨证论治与否将患者分为两组(错误辨证组和正确辨证组)。结合统计理论与随机游走方法评估两种治疗的临床疗效。 结果:正确辨证组有273例患者,4例死亡(病死率为1.47%)。错误辨证组有297例患者,7例死亡(病死率为2.36%)。正确辨证组综合评价指标的随机波动峰值、游走步数、游走正增长率、比值、随机波动幂律、增长率及综合评价指标记录次数分别为1472、13617、0.1081、9.25、0.6742、0.4706和3128,而错误辨证组分别为1030、14588、0.0706、14.16、0.6606、0.3128和3293。两组的随机波动幂律均超过0.5。 结论:生脉注射液治疗冠心病患者时,综合评价指标与治疗方法之间存在长程相关性。正确辨证下生脉注射液的临床疗效优于错误辨证下生脉注射液的疗效。
Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao. 2008-9
Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao. 2008-9
Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2011-10
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2014-12-3
Chin J Integr Med. 2010-9-25