Khanna Nina, Opravil Milos, Furrer Hansjakob, Cavassini Matthias, Vernazza Pietro, Bernasconi Enos, Weber Rainer, Hirschel Bernard, Battegay Manuel, Kaufmann Gilbert R
Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.
Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Oct 15;47(8):1093-101. doi: 10.1086/592113.
BACKGROUND: In recent years, treatment options for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection have changed from nonboosted protease inhibitors (PIs) to nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) and boosted PI-based antiretroviral drug regimens, but the impact on immunological recovery remains uncertain. METHODS: During January 1996 through December 2004 [corrected] all patients in the Swiss HIV Cohort were included if they received the first combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) and had known baseline CD4(+) T cell counts and HIV-1 RNA values (n = 3293). For follow-up, we used the Swiss HIV Cohort Study database update of May 2007 [corrected] The mean (+/-SD) duration of follow-up was 26.8 +/- 20.5 months. The follow-up time was limited to the duration of the first cART. CD4(+) T cell recovery was analyzed in 3 different treatment groups: nonboosted PI, NNRTI, or boosted PI. The end point was the absolute increase of CD4(+) T cell count in the 3 treatment groups after the initiation of cART. RESULTS: Two thousand five hundred ninety individuals (78.7%) initiated a nonboosted-PI regimen, 452 (13.7%) initiated an NNRTI regimen, and 251 (7.6%) initiated a boosted-PI regimen. Absolute CD4(+) T cell count increases at 48 months were as follows: in the nonboosted-PI group, from 210 to 520 cells/muL; in the NNRTI group, from 220 to 475 cells/muL; and in the boosted-PI group, from 168 to 511 cells/muL. In a multivariate analysis, the treatment group did not affect the response of CD4(+) T cells; however, increased age, pretreatment with nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors, serological tests positive for hepatitis C virus, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention stage C infection, lower baseline CD4(+) T cell count, and lower baseline HIV-1 RNA level were risk factors for smaller increases in CD4(+) T cell count. CONCLUSION: CD4(+) T cell recovery was similar in patients receiving nonboosted PI-, NNRTI-, and boosted PI-based cART.
背景:近年来,人类免疫缺陷病毒1型(HIV-1)感染的治疗方案已从非增效蛋白酶抑制剂(PIs)转变为非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂(NNRTIs)以及基于增效PI的抗逆转录病毒药物治疗方案,但对免疫恢复的影响仍不确定。 方法:在1996年1月至2004年12月期间[校正后],瑞士HIV队列中的所有患者,若接受了首次联合抗逆转录病毒治疗(cART)且已知基线CD4(+) T细胞计数和HIV-1 RNA值,则纳入研究(n = 3293)。为进行随访,我们使用了2007年5月瑞士HIV队列研究数据库的更新数据[校正后]。随访的平均(±标准差)时长为26.8 ± 20.5个月。随访时间限制为首次cART的持续时间。在3个不同治疗组中分析CD4(+) T细胞恢复情况:非增效PI组、NNRTI组或增效PI组。终点是cART启动后3个治疗组中CD4(+) T细胞计数的绝对增加量。 结果:2590名个体(78.7%)开始使用非增效PI治疗方案,452名(13.7%)开始使用NNRTI治疗方案,251名(7.6%)开始使用增效PI治疗方案。48个月时CD4(+) T细胞计数的绝对增加量如下:非增效PI组,从210个细胞/μL增至520个细胞/μL;NNRTI组,从220个细胞/μL增至475个细胞/μL;增效PI组,从168个细胞/μL增至511个细胞/μL。在多变量分析中,治疗组不影响CD4(+) T细胞的反应;然而,年龄增加、核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂预处理、丙型肝炎病毒血清学检测呈阳性、疾病控制和预防中心C期感染、较低的基线CD4(+) T细胞计数以及较低的基线HIV-1 RNA水平是CD4(+) T细胞计数增加较小的危险因素。 结论:接受基于非增效PI、NNRTI和增效PI的cART治疗的患者,其CD4(+) T细胞恢复情况相似。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016-10
HIV AIDS (Auckl). 2015-10-27