• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Film-screen combinations for mammography].

作者信息

Säbel M, Aichinger H

机构信息

Frauenklinik der Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg.

出版信息

Aktuelle Radiol. 1991 May;1(3):105-12.

PMID:1878377
Abstract

Optimizing and standardizing mammography as well as its quality assurance are gaining in importance with regard to the screening programmes that are being initiated for the early detection of breast cancer. In Germany, the guidelines of the Bundesärztekammer, the directives implementing section 4 and section 16 of the Röntgenverordnung and the standards DIN 6868, Part 7 and 52 are available. The data in these standards concerning tolerances and guide values for physical variables of the imaging system are only partially consistent. This also applies to the comparison with the document "Quality criteria for x-ray exposures in medical diagnostics" of the Commission of the European Communities. The different statements concerning the switch-off value of the dose in particular, reflect an uncertainty as to how unsharpness and noise of the image receptor impair the medical value of the images. With regard to the increased demands for visual resolution capacity, it can be stated that the "Medical quality requirements" and the "Radiographic guide-lines" harmonize with one another only inadequately. Contrast is one of the most important image quality parameters in mammography. Practically no statement is made on this in the available documents. One reason for the present unsatisfactory situation is certainly the especially high demands placed on image quality in mammography. In the present paper, these points of criticism are discussed in detail and proposals for closer specification and better delineation of the physical image quality parameters are submitted.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Film-screen combinations for mammography].
Aktuelle Radiol. 1991 May;1(3):105-12.
2
Recent advances in screen-film mammography.
Radiol Clin North Am. 1987 Sep;25(5):913-28.
3
Global quality control perspective for the physical and technical aspects of screen-film mammography--image quality and radiation dose.乳腺钼靶摄影物理和技术方面的全球质量控制视角——图像质量与辐射剂量
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2006;121(4):445-51. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncl051. Epub 2006 May 18.
4
Clinical evaluation of a new set of image quality criteria for mammography.一套用于乳腺钼靶摄影的新图像质量标准的临床评估。
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;114(1-3):389-94. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nch573.
5
Artifacts in digital mammography.数字化乳腺摄影中的伪影。
JBR-BTR. 2008 Nov-Dec;91(6):262-3.
6
Quality assurance in screening mammography.乳腺钼靶筛查中的质量保证
Health Devices. 1990 May-Jun;19(5-6):152-98.
7
Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.使用数字化图像与乳腺钼靶摄影对乳腺肿块诊断准确性的比较。
Acta Radiol. 2008 Jul;49(6):618-22. doi: 10.1080/02841850802014610.
8
[Picture quality and film mammography. I. The physical parameters of the filming system (gradation, sensitivity, definition and granularity) and the effect of exposure geometry (author's transl)].[乳腺钼靶摄影的图像质量。I. 成像系统的物理参数(灰度、灵敏度、清晰度和颗粒度)以及曝光几何条件的影响(作者译)]
Rofo. 1976 Sep;125(3):269-79. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1230461.
9
Can the average glandular dose in routine digital mammography screening be reduced? A pilot study using revised image quality criteria.常规数字化乳腺钼靶筛查中的平均腺体剂量能降低吗?一项采用修订图像质量标准的试点研究。
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;114(1-3):383-8. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nch555.
10
Breast cancer screening--the European experience.乳腺癌筛查——欧洲的经验
Int J Fertil Womens Med. 2004 Sep-Oct;49(5):228-30.